Yazar "Altinsoy, Hasan Baki" seçeneğine göre listele
Listeleniyor 1 - 2 / 2
Sayfa Başına Sonuç
Sıralama seçenekleri
Öğe Smartphone evaluation of postero-anterior chest x-rays: An inter-observer study(W B Saunders Co-Elsevier Inc, 2021) Bogan, Mustafa; Altinsoy, Hasan Baki; Karadag, MehmetBackground: Posterior-anterior chest x-ray (PA-CXR) is among the most commonly used imaging methods in the diagnosis both in the emergency departments (ED) and the other clinics. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic reliability of PA-CXRs sent via a smartphone. Methods: This study was conducted as an inter-observer study. PA-CXRs were photographed with a smartphone and they were sent to two separate participants (emergency medicine specialists one with 4 years experience and another with 3) via the WhatsApp application. And the participants evaluated to these images on their mobile phone. Results: A poor concordance was determined in a ratio of 3/8 and good concordance was detected in a ratio of 3/8 between the two participants (p < 0.05). It was observed that only the mediastinum assessments could be an alternative to the gold standard (p < 0.01). Conclusion: We may conclude that the assessments done via a smartphone (photographing and sharing) may not be reliable. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.Öğe Using Smartphone to Evaluate Cranial Computed Tomography Videos: An Inter-Observer Study(Duzce Univ, Fac Medicine, 2022) Naldemir, Ibrahim Feyyaz; Karaman, Ahmet Kursat; Altinsoy, Hasan Baki; Bogan, Mustafa; Karadag, MehmetObjective: Many clinicians receive Cranial Computed Tomography (CCT) images or videos by their smartphone. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the CCT videos that are shared through smartphone in the diagnosis. Methods: The CCT videos that were sent via WhatsApp were examined in 9 sections: soft tissue, bone structure, parenchyma, ventricle, vascular structures, middle ear, orbits, sinuses and the extra axial space. Results: The CCT videos were analyzed in 9 sections; there was a perfect agreement among specialists in one of these sections, good agreement in 6 and poor agreement in 2. When compared with the gold standard, it was shown that 5 out of 9 sections could be an alternative to the gold standard. Conclusions: It may be thought that evaluation of the CCT videos can be obtained with messenger applications such as WhatsApp, which is a cheap, fast and common application. But this study shows that diagnostic images and videos shared through the smartphone by a messenger application can not be an alternative to standard evaluations.