Yazar "Cingi, Cemal" seçeneğine göre listele
Listeleniyor 1 - 2 / 2
Sayfa Başına Sonuç
Sıralama seçenekleri
Öğe Efficacy of montelukast and desloratadine combination in allergic rhinitis(Deomed Publ, Istanbul, 2011) Cingi, Cemal; Oghan, Fatih; Unlu, Halis; Tekat, Atilla; Okuyucu, SemsettinAllergic rhinitis represents a global health problem affecting 10 to 25% of the population worldwide. The complications i.e. sinusitis, nasal polyps, middle ear and lower respiratory tract infections increase the importance of allergic rhinitis. Besides treatment costs, due to wage loss and decrease in productive capacity it has a huge negative impact on community. It may also seriously affect quality of life. Despite recent developments in its treatment modalities, several studies have indicated that the prevalence of allergic rhinitis is increasing. New knowledge on the mechanisms underlying allergic inflammation of the airways has resulted in better therapeutic strategies for allergic rhinitis. Montelukast and desloratadine has powerful effects on allergic rhinitis. Since studies demonstrate that both products have better pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles, and having side effects similar to placebo, they are better options for this sub-group. The concomitant use of both drugs is believed to provide a better control on the symptoms of allergic rhinitis. The combination therapy possibly provides a more potential reduction in early and late allergic and inflammatory response to histamine and histamine like mediators during allergen inhalation. Including a fixed dose combination of montolukast-desloratadine to the treatment strategy seems to be a more rational and cost effective approach in these groups of patients.Öğe The Score For Allergic Rhinitis study in Turkey(Sage Publications Inc, 2011) Cingi, Cemal; Songu, Murat; Ural, Ahmet; Annesi-Maesano, Isabella; Erdogmus, Nagehan; Bal, Cengiz; Kahya, VolkanBackground: The clinical definition of allergic rhinitis (AR) is difficult to use in epidemiological settings of large populations where it is impossible to obtain the laboratory evidence of each immune response. However, the standardization of the definition of AR in epidemiological studies is of crucial importance. This study was designed to estimate the prevalence of AR in an adult general population with respect to seven distinct geographical regions in Turkey. Methods: Individuals were evaluated with the Score for Allergic Rhinitis (SFAR) questionnaire for a national cross-sectional study. The Turkish version of the SFAR questionnaire was tested for clarity and sensitivity in a small sample of the general population. Results: Among the 3967 interviewed subjects, the overall prevalence of AR was 29.6%, with regional variations (from 21.0% in the southeastern Anatolia region to 36.1% in the Marmara region). The prevalence was higher in women and in urban area of residence. Conclusion: This national survey confirmed the elevated prevalence of AR in Turkey. Our findings may contribute to the formulation of the public health policy and development of preventive and therapeutic strategies for AR in eastern Europe. (Am J Rhinol Allergy 25, 333-337, 2011; doi: 10.2500/ajra.2011.25.3665)