Yazar "Diker, Kenan" seçeneğine göre listele

Listeleniyor 1 - 3 / 3
  • Küçük Resim
    Öğe
    Cotton yields under different furrow irrigation management techniques in the Southeastern Anatolia Project (GAP) area, Turkey
    (Springer, 2007) Uenlue, Mustafa; Kanber, Riza; Onder, Sermet; Sezen, Metin; Diker, Kenan; Ozekici, Bulent; Oylu, Mustafa
    The continuous flow furrow irrigation (COFFI), surge flow furrow irrigation (SUFFI), cutback flow furrow irrigation (CUFFI), variable alternate flow furrow irrigation (VAFFI), and tail water reuse system furrow (TWRSF) techniques with the same inflow rate of 0.072 m(3) min(-1) were compared in relation to the cotton yield and water use efficiency at a 3-year field study conducted on cotton (Gossypium spp.) in the Southeastern Anatolia Project (GAP) area of Turkey. Yields revealed significant statistical differences between the furrow management techniques (P < 0.05). The maximum yield was obtained from the COFFI treatment (2,630 and 2,920 kg ha(-1)) in the first 2 years, and from SUFFI and CUFFI treatments (3,690 and 3,780 kg ha(-1), respectively) in the last year. There were significant yield reductions, which varied from 10 to 35% in TWRSF and from 11 to 19% in VAFFI treatments although 43 and 28% more water was applied to the TWRSF than to CUFFI and SUFFI treatments, respectively. The average total water use efficiencies (WUEET) varied from 4.14 (VAFFI) to 2.59 (COFFI). The corresponding values were 0.37 and 0.36 kg ha(-1) m(-3) for CUFFI and SUFFI, respectively. The average irrigation water use efficiency (WUEIR) for CUFFI and SUFFI treatments were 0.30 and 0.23 kg ha(-1) m(-3), respectively.
  • Küçük Resim
    Öğe
    Different furrow management techniques for cotton production and water conservation in Harran Plain, Sanliurfa
    (Tubitak Scientific & Technological Research Council Turkey, 2012) Kanber, Riza; Onder, Sermet; Unlu, Mustafa; Tekin, Servet; Sezen, S. Metin; Diker, Kenan
    In this study, the water saving and conservation potential of various furrow irrigation management techniques for irrigated cotton were compared. Conventional every-furrow irrigation with open-end furrows (EFO) and blocked-end furrows (EFB), and alternate every-other-furrow management with open-end furrows (AFO) and blocked-end furrows (AFB), were considered. Considerable seasonal water savings were obtained with AFO and AFB flows, on average from 717 mm to 906 mm, respectively, when compared to EFO. Alternate furrows showed the ability to reduce tailwater runoff considerably. When compared with EFO, water use was reduced by 9063 m(3) ha(-1) (60%) using AFB and 7167 m(3) ha(-1) (48%) using AFO, with decreases in yield of 765 kg ha(-1) (27%) and 492 kg ha(-1) (17%), respectively. Similarly, average water use efficiencies were 0.36 kg m(-3) for AFB and 0.31 kg m(-3) for AFO, compared to 0.20 kg m(-3) for EFO. Results showed the possibility of applying alternate-flow furrow management techniques for water conservation in cotton irrigation. Additionally, the alternate furrow method could also be considered as a deficit irrigation approach in the Harran Plain.
  • Küçük Resim
    Öğe
    Different furrow management techniques for cotton production and water conservation in Harran Plain, Şanlıurfa
    (2012) Kanber, Rıza; Önder, Sermet; Ünlü, Mustafa; Tekin, Servet; Sezen, Semih Metin; Diker, Kenan
    Abstract: In this study, the water saving and conservation potential of various furrow irrigation management techniques for irrigated cotton were compared. Conventional every-furrow irrigation with open-end furrows (EFO) and blockedend furrows (EFB), and alternate every-other-furrow management with open-end furrows (AFO) and blocked-end furrows (AFB), were considered. Considerable seasonal water savings were obtained with AFO and AFB fl ows, on average from 717 mm to 906 mm, respectively, when compared to EFO. Alternate furrows showed the ability to reduce tailwater runoff considerably. When compared with EFO, water use was reduced by 9063 m3 ha–1 (60%) using AFB and 7167 m3 ha–1 (48%) using AFO, with decreases in yield of 765 kg ha–1 (27%) and 492 kg ha–1 (17%), respectively. Similarly, average water use effi ciencies were 0.36 kg m–3 for AFB and 0.31 kg m–3 for AFO, compared to 0.20 kg m–3 for EFO. Results showed the possibility of applying alternate-fl ow furrow management techniques for water conservation in cotton irrigation. Additionally, the alternate furrow method could also be considered as a defi cit irrigation approach in the Harran Plain.