Yazar "Dokur, Mehmet" seçeneğine göre listele
Listeleniyor 1 - 8 / 8
Sayfa Başına Sonuç
Sıralama seçenekleri
Öğe An altmetric study: Social attention based evaluation of top-100 publications about the COVID-19 pandemic from notification of the first case to the 6th month(2021) Dokur, Mehmet; Baysoy, Nüket Güler; Uysal, Betül Borku; Karadağ, Mehmet; Demirbilek, MahmutObjective: Altmetrics, or alternative-metrics, have\rrecently emerged as a web-based metrics measuring the\rimpact of an individual article in social media accounts\rwith an emphasis on the public attention/engagement\rwith the research output. Aim of this study is to perform\rmid-2020 altmetric analysis of top-100 articles about\rCOVID-19 that provoked the most online attention.\rMethods: Altmetric Explorer search was performed\rin June 3th ,2020. After ranked by altmetric attention\rscore (AAS: an automatically calculated weighted count\rof all of the attention a research output has received in\rsocial media), articles that are not related by COVID-19\rwere excluded and the first-100 COVID-19-related\rarticles were analyzed. Variables evaluated were (I)\rAAS, (II) dimensions-badge (interactive visualizations\rthat showcase the citation data origins for individual\rpublications), (III) month of publication, (IV) distribution\rof web-sources, (V) demographic-breakdown type\rdistributions of citations, (VI) geographic-breakdown\rtype distributions of citations, (VII) level-of-evidence\r(decided using SIGN-Criteria) (VIII) Q-categories ofscientific journals, and (IX) h-index. Descriptive and\rcorrelational statistics were performed. Kruskal-Wallis\rtest was used for AAS and dimensions-badge value\rcomparisons while post-hoc analyses were performed\rby Dunn test. Spearman correlation coefficients were\rcalculated to detect linear relationship between\rnumerical variables. Analyses were performed by SPSS-\r23.0 and p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.\rResults: Most (74%) of the disseminated articles\rwere published in Q1-journals while evidence levels were\rmostly level-3/level-4. Content of the first 3 articles was\rabout the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions,\rorigin of COVID-19 and chloroquine usage, respectively.\rThere was no significant difference between AAS in\rdifferent months (p=0.673) but dimensions-badges in\rJanuary were significantly higher (p<0.05). There was a\rweak positive correlation between AAS and dimensionsbadge\r(r=0.250; p=0.017).\rConclusion: Dimensions-badge and AAS results\rrevealed that academia discussed COVID-19 much more\rin the first-month of pandemic, but then interests\rcontinued parallelly in academia and other social media\rplatforms, including public. Academicians have discussed\rexperiences of large-patient series but public preferred\rwhat is potentially protective or risky for them. Although\renormously fast accumulation and dissemination of\rnew scientific publications were witnessed, it seems\rsens-clinique rather than strict evidence-based-advice\rtransferred to journals. Because infodemic is another\remerging problem, every scientist should be ethically\rmore responsible about the publication they choose\rto disseminate. Interpretations/public-messages of\rscientists might also be critical, given the fact that only\r15% of discussed Covid-19 articles was in level-1/level-2\revidence.Öğe An altmetric study: Social attention based evaluation of top-100 publications about the COVID-19 pandemic from notification of the first case to the 6th month(Refik Saydam National Public Health Agency (RSNPHA), 2021) Dokur, Mehmet; Baysoy, Nüket Güler; Uysal, Betül Borku; Karadağ, Mehmet; Demirbilek, MahmutObjective: Altmetrics, or alternative-metrics, have recently emerged as a web-based metrics measuring the impact of an individual article in social media accounts with an emphasis on the public attention/engagement with the research output. Aim of this study is to perform mid-2020 altmetric analysis of top-100 articles about COVID-19 that provoked the most online attention. Methods: Altmetric Explorer search was performed in June 3th,2020. After ranked by altmetric attention score (AAS: an automatically calculated weighted count of all of the attention a research output has received in social media), articles that are not related by COVID-19 were excluded and the first-100 COVID-19-related articles were analyzed. Variables evaluated were (I) AAS, (II) dimensions-badge (interactive visualizations that showcase the citation data origins for individual publications), (III) month of publication, (IV) distribution of web-sources, (V) demographic-breakdown type distributions of citations, (VI) geographic-breakdown type distributions of citations, (VII) level-of-evidence (decided using SIGN-Criteria) (VIII) Q-categories of scientific journals, and (IX) h-index. Descriptive and correlational statistics were performed. Kruskal-Wallis test was used for AAS and dimensions-badge value comparisons while post-hoc analyses were performed by Dunn test. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated to detect linear relationship between numerical variables. Analyses were performed by SPSS23.0 and p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Most (74%) of the disseminated articles were published in Q1-journals while evidence levels were mostly level-3/level-4. Content of the first 3 articles was about the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions, origin of COVID-19 and chloroquine usage, respectively. There was no significant difference between AAS in different months (p=0.673) but dimensions-badges in January were significantly higher (p<0.05). There was a weak positive correlation between AAS and dimensionsbadge (r=0.250; p=0.017). Conclusion: Dimensions-badge and AAS results revealed that academia discussed COVID-19 much more in the first-month of pandemic, but then interests continued parallelly in academia and other social media platforms, including public. Academicians have discussed experiences of large-patient series but public preferred what is potentially protective or risky for them. Although enormously fast accumulation and dissemination of new scientific publications were witnessed, it seems sens-clinique rather than strict evidence-based-advice transferred to journals. Because infodemic is another emerging problem, every scientist should be ethically more responsible about the publication they choose to disseminate. Interpretations/public-messages of scientists might also be critical, given the fact that only 15% of discussed Covid-19 articles was in level-1/level-2 evidence © 2021,Turk Hijyen ve Deneysel Biyoloji Dergisi.All Rights ReservedÖğe Bibliometric and altmetric analysis of publications examining education methods in realm of anatomy(2021) Petekkaya, Emine; Karadağ, Mehmet; Dokur, MehmetObjectives: This study aimed to investigate the significance of publications examining the effectiveness of education methods in the field of anatomy with the method of bibliometric and altmetric analysis, as well as online attention levels. Methods: To search all publications, “Anatomy education” was entered as a search term on the Web of Science database. The topics, journal impact factors, publication years and research centers of the first 100 articles with the highest numbers of citations were examined, and their analysis was conducted with the “Altmetric it on website: http: almetric.com”. Results: Four thousand, three hundred fifty-six articles published in the period of 1975-2019 containing the key phrase “Anatomy education” were found on Web of Science. The study with the highest number of citations was the study published by McLachlan et al. titled “Teaching anatomy without cadavers, 2004”. It was observed that the study titled “The production of anatomical teaching resources using three-dimensional (3D) printing technology, 2014” was the article with the highest rate of sharing on Twitter with the highest altmetric attention score (AAS) value. The AAS rates varied between 130 and 0. Conclusions: Bibliometric and altmetric analysis provides significant but different points of view regarding the effects of an article in the world of science. The altmetrics score may provide contributions in determining the direction of studies regarding the high-level interests and perceptions of the public on dynamic science and the field of medicine.Öğe Electric scooters as a silent source of danger in increasing use among young people: a single-center in-depth accident analysis(Turkish Assoc Trauma Emergency Surgery, 2023) Demir, Necdet; Dokur, Mehmet; Agdogan, Ozgur; Koc, Suna; Karadag, Mehmet; Dokur, Ibrahim FikriBACKGROUND: The reasons for the increase in accidents involving shared stand-up e-scooters in recent years may be the wide-spread use of e-scooters among young people, especially in metropolitan areas with heavy traffic, non-compliance with traffic rules, and insufficient legal regulations. In this study, we analyzed in detail the typical features of rider-sharing e-scooter-related injuries brought to the emergency department of our hospital in the light of current literature.METHODS: The clinical and accident characteristics of 60 patients with surgical requirements who were brought to the emergency department of our hospital due to e-scooter-related accidents between 2020 and 2020 were analyzed using statistical methods ret-rospectively.RESULTS: The majority of the victims were university students and the number of victims of the male gender was slightly higher and the mean age was 25.3 +/- 13.0 years. Most e-scooter accidents occur on weekdays. Most of the e-scooter-related accidents happen on weekdays and are non-collision type accidents. The majority of e-scooter-related accident victims were in the minor trauma group (injury severity score <9), predominantly had extremity and soft-tissue injuries and needed radiological examination (44 patients, 73.3%), and only eight victims (13.3%) required surgical operation and also all of the e-scooter victims were discharged fully healed.CONCLUSION: Among the more common collision-free e-scooter-related accidents that have a lower trauma severity score or cause minor soft-tissue injury, mono-trauma occurs more commonly than multisystem trauma; likewise, radius and nasal-weighted monofractures occur more commonly than multiple fractures, according to this study. Besides, effective measures and legal regulations should be put in place to prevent e-scooter-related accidents.Öğe Evaluation of the Relationship between Cancer and Antioxidants from an Altmetric Perspective(2022) Vardar, Gökay; Hanikoğlu, Ferhat; Guney, Turkan; Dokur, Mehmet; Karadağ, MehmetObjectives: Antioxidants have been shown in research to have significant effects on serious diseases, particularly cancer. The goal of our experiment was to determine and analyzed 100 articles with the highest Altmetric attention scores (AAS) concerning antioxidants and cancer.\rMethods: Altmetric score analyzes were obtained downloading the from the Altmetric.com website. A research output's altmetric score was calculated using an algorithm based on the weighted number of all attention it receives.\rResults: The Altmetric scores of the 100 articles analyzed varied from 12 to 846. Twitter (n=86) was the most mentioned social media network in the articles. According to the research categories of the T100 articles in our analysis, the majority \rwere published in \"Medical and Health Science''. In terms of Twitter geographical breakdown, the United States leads among other nations, followed by the United Kingdom. According to Twitter demographics, the most of tweets on \rantioxidants and cancer were shared by members of the public.\rConclusion: In science and research, social media is advocated as an alternative to traditional power structures and our findings could provide a preliminary look at the social, clinical, and academic impact of antioxidant and cancer research.Öğe Most notable 100 articles of COVID-19: an Altmetric study based on bibliometric analysis(Springer London Ltd, 2021) Borku Uysal, Betul; Islamoglu, Mehmet Sami; Koc, Suna; Karadag, Mehmet; Dokur, MehmetObjective The purpose of this study is to guide researchers in the COVID-19 pandemic by evaluating the 100 most cited articles of COVID-19 in terms of bibliometric analysis, Altmetric scores, and dimension badges. Methods COVID-19 was entered as the search term in Thomson Reuter's Web of Science database. The 100 most cited articles (T100) were analyzed bibliometrically. Altmetric attention scores (AASs) and dimension badge scores of the articles were evaluated. Results T100 articles were published from January to September 2020. The average citation of the top 100 articles on COVID-19 was 320 +/- 344.3 (143-2676). The language of all articles was English. The average Altmetric value of T100 is 3246 +/- 3795 (85-16,548) and the mean dimension badge value was 670 +/- 541.6 (176-4232). Epidemiological features (n = 22) and treatment (n = 21) were at the top of the main topics of T100 articles. Conclusion The more citations an article is made, the more it indicates the contribution of that article to science. However, the number of citations is not always the only indicator of article quality. The existence of methods that measure the impact of the article outside the academia to measure the value of the article arises more in an issue that affects the whole world, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.Öğe The Prognostic Importance of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Adult Patients with Sepsis Who Underwent Hemoperfusion in General Intensive Care Unit(Cordus, 2022) Koc, Suna; Ozer, Turkan; Dokur, Mehmet; Kucukcerit, Taner Serif; Karaoguz, Burcu; Celep, Yunus Emre; Aktepe, EmreObjective: Sepsis is a major cause of mortality and morbidity in the intensive care units. The goal of this study is to investigate whether changes in the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio are a prognostic marker for patients with sepsis (according to sepsis stages, and patient's and disease's characteristics) who have been followed up in the intensive care unit and who have received HA330 resin-directed hemadsorption column for sepsis. Methods: The study included a group of 100 (male [healed: 19, exitus: 42], female [cured: 29, exitus: 10]) sepsis patients who were followed up in the intensive care unit between December 2019 and December 2021 and who received HA-330 sepsis adsorption column. Results: Although a strong positive correlation was found between the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and the baseline platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio values (r = 0.725 and P = .001), a weak positive correlation was found between the baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and the comorbidity values (r = 0.253 and P = .001). In addition, the period found for hemoperfusion in those who healed was statistically significantly higher in exitus patients (P = .001). It was noted that the improvement in repeated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio measurements in the healing and death observations was identical (P > .05). The repeated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio measurement values were found to be statistically significantly different for those with healing (P = .014). In addition, repeated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio measurement values were found to be statistically significantly different from those with exitus (P = .001). It was observed that the change of repeated platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio measurements in the observations with healing and death was statistically significant (P < .05). Conclusion: It is thought that it may be a cheap and useful biomarker in the prognosis of patients who are followed up in the intensive care unit and are treated with HA-330 sepsis adsorption column since the rate of neutrophils and lymphocytes in patients with hematological healing and death differs greatly.Öğe A social attention with altmetric score analysis on the relationship between oxidative stress and cancer(2022) Hanikoğlu, Ferhat; Vardar, Gökay; Ozben, Tomrıs; Karadağ, Mehmet; Dokur, MehmetOxidative stress has a crucial role in the development of various cancers. The aim of our study was to identify and analyze research articles about oxidative stress and cancer that have attracted the highest online attention. Our study is the first one evaluating social media attention to the articles on cancer and oxidative stress published in academic literature. Altmetric Explorer was used to identify research articles about oxidative stress and cancer. We evaluated the top 50 research articles having the highest Altmetric attention scores (AAS), using the Altmetric.com database. The Altmetric Attention Score (AAS) of 50 articles (T50) investigated was between 15 and 445 (mean±SD; 60.66±86.18). The social media platforms where the T50 articles are mentioned from highest to the lowest scores are the Facebook (n=2678) followed by Twitter (n=886) and Google + users (n=214). According to demographic breakdowns in Twitter, tweet counts were similar between scientists (34%) and not scientists (32%). Total citations of the 50 articles ranged from 3 to 3700 (mean ± SE; 203.40±87.07). A weak statistically significant positive correlation was found between the Altmetric score and the Q category (r=0.338: p=0.016). Interestingly, there was no correlation between Altmetric score and number of article citations. The increasing use of online social media platforms makes this area worthy, and the online impact of an article is becoming progressively more convenient for academic and public accessibility. Social media also may give oppurtunity to the researchers for disseminating their studies in scholar and non-scholar platforms.
