Yazar "Seker, Oya" seçeneğine göre listele
Listeleniyor 1 - 2 / 2
Sayfa Başına Sonuç
Sıralama seçenekleri
Öğe Evaluating the Effect of Different Mouthrinses on Properties of the Enamel and Dental Composite Surfaces(Revista Chimie Srl, 2024) Kose, Hazal Deniz; Seker, OyaThis study investigated the effects of different solutions (artificial saliva, Listerine Cool Mintalcohol containing and Colgate Plax-alcohol free) on the nanohardness, elastic modulus and surface roughness of enamel surface and composite materials (Admira Fusion, Clearfil Majesty Esthetic and Mosaic Universal). Specimens of 2 mm depth and 5 mm diameter were stored in solutions for 12 h at 37(degrees)C. Baseline and final measurements were obtained using a HYSITRON TI 950 TriboIndenter testing machine. The applied force to each specimen increased from 0 to 1000 mu N. For SEM images, one sample in each group was covered with a thin layer of mix of gold and palladium using a sputter coater (Quorum Q150R ES, UK). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were taken at 5000x magnifications to evaluate the surface morphology. Statistical analysis for hardness, elastic modulus and roughness was performed by Two-way ANOVA, Benferroni and Tukey HSD at a significance level 0.05. The results of this study showed that the highest value of surface roughness and lowest hardness and elastic modulus were presented by Admira (p<0.001). Listerine caused significantly increased surface roughness (p<0.001) and decreased hardness and elastic modulus parameters (p<0.001). The mouthrinse containing alcohol caused more significant changes in the nanohardness, elastic modulus, surface roughness values of enamel and composite surfaces.Öğe In vitro comparison of high-definition US, CBCT and periapical radiography in the diagnosis of proximal and recurrent caries(British Inst Radiology, 2021) Seker, Oya; Kamburoglu, Kivanc; Sahin, Cihan; Eratam, Nejlan; Cakmak, Esra Ece; Sonmez, Gul; Ozen, DogukanObjective: To assess the in vitro performance of high-definition (HD) US, CBCT and periapical radiography for the visibility of proximal and recurrent caries in teeth with and without restoration. Methods: A total of 240 molar teeth were divided into eight groups each comprised of 30 teeth. Control groups consisted of teeth without caries (Group 1-4; N = 120), whereas diseased groups consisted of teeth with proximal caries (Group 5-8; N = 120 teeth). Finally, a total of four image sets were obtained as follows: i) PSP periapical radiography, ii) CBCT 0.075mm voxel size, iii) CBCT 0.2mm voxel size and iv) HD US images. The image sets were viewed separately by four observers by using a 5-point confidence scale. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated. The areas under the ROC curves were compared using chi-square tests. Significance level was set at alpha = 0.05. Results: Intraobserver agreement for both readings for the four observers ranged between 0.848 and 0.988 for CBCT (0.075mm) images; 0.658 and 0.952 for CBCT (0.2mm) images; 0.555 and 0.810 for periapical images; 0.427 and 0.676 for US images. Highest AUC values were found for CBCT (0.075 mm) images and lowest for US images. Statistically significant differences were found among CBCT (0.075mm) images and US images (p < 0.001), CBCT (0.2 mm) images and US images (p < 0.001) and periapical images and US images (p < 0.001) for the detection of proximal caries. Conclusion: Periapical and CBCT images outperformed HD US imaging in the detection of proximal dental caries.