In vitro comparison of high-definition US, CBCT and periapical radiography in the diagnosis of proximal and recurrent caries

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridCakmak, Esra Ece/0000-0001-5887-7081
dc.authoridSONMEZ, GUL/0000-0002-7034-9879
dc.authoridOZEN, DOGUKAN/0000-0003-1943-2690
dc.contributor.authorSeker, Oya
dc.contributor.authorKamburoglu, Kivanc
dc.contributor.authorSahin, Cihan
dc.contributor.authorEratam, Nejlan
dc.contributor.authorCakmak, Esra Ece
dc.contributor.authorSonmez, Gul
dc.contributor.authorOzen, Dogukan
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T20:06:33Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T20:06:33Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: To assess the in vitro performance of high-definition (HD) US, CBCT and periapical radiography for the visibility of proximal and recurrent caries in teeth with and without restoration. Methods: A total of 240 molar teeth were divided into eight groups each comprised of 30 teeth. Control groups consisted of teeth without caries (Group 1-4; N = 120), whereas diseased groups consisted of teeth with proximal caries (Group 5-8; N = 120 teeth). Finally, a total of four image sets were obtained as follows: i) PSP periapical radiography, ii) CBCT 0.075mm voxel size, iii) CBCT 0.2mm voxel size and iv) HD US images. The image sets were viewed separately by four observers by using a 5-point confidence scale. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated. The areas under the ROC curves were compared using chi-square tests. Significance level was set at alpha = 0.05. Results: Intraobserver agreement for both readings for the four observers ranged between 0.848 and 0.988 for CBCT (0.075mm) images; 0.658 and 0.952 for CBCT (0.2mm) images; 0.555 and 0.810 for periapical images; 0.427 and 0.676 for US images. Highest AUC values were found for CBCT (0.075 mm) images and lowest for US images. Statistically significant differences were found among CBCT (0.075mm) images and US images (p < 0.001), CBCT (0.2 mm) images and US images (p < 0.001) and periapical images and US images (p < 0.001) for the detection of proximal caries. Conclusion: Periapical and CBCT images outperformed HD US imaging in the detection of proximal dental caries.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAnkara University Scien-tific Research Projects Unit [:16A0234001]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by Ankara University Scien-tific Research Projects Unit (No:16A0234001) .en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1259/dmfr.20210026
dc.identifier.issn0250-832X
dc.identifier.issn1476-542X
dc.identifier.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.pmid33979235en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85120030876en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20210026
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/8573
dc.identifier.volume50en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000730396600010en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBritish Inst Radiologyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofDentomaxillofacial Radiologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCaries diagnosisen_US
dc.subjectRestorative materialsen_US
dc.subjectUSen_US
dc.subjectRadiographyen_US
dc.subjectCBCTen_US
dc.subjectROC Analysisen_US
dc.titleIn vitro comparison of high-definition US, CBCT and periapical radiography in the diagnosis of proximal and recurrent cariesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Tam Metin / Full text
Boyut:
505.71 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu