Efficacy of different surface treatments and universal adhesives on the microtensile bond strength of bulk-fill composite repair

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridGumustas, Burak/0000-0002-7538-1763
dc.authoridSismanoglu, Soner/0000-0002-1272-5581
dc.authoridYildirim Bilmez, Zuhal/0000-0002-8869-2261
dc.contributor.authorSismanoglu, Soner
dc.contributor.authorGurcan, Aliye Tuhce
dc.contributor.authorYildirim-Bilmez, Zuhal
dc.contributor.authorGumustas, Burak
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T21:00:28Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T21:00:28Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of different surface treatments and aging on the microtensile bond strength (mu TBS) of bulk-fill composite resins. Bulk-fill composites (Filtek One; 3M ESPE) randomly received five different surface treatments: (1) no treatment, control, (2) 37% phosphoric acid etching (PA), (3) 9% hydrofluoric acid etching (HF), (4) air-borne particle abrasion with 50-mu m alumina particles (Al2O3), (5) tribochemical silica coating (CoJet). Following, the specimens were divided into three subgroups according to universal adhesive applied: Clearfil Universal Bond (CU; Kuraray), Prime&Bond Universal (PBU; Dentsply Sirona), or Single Bond Universal (SBU; 3M ESPE). A nanofill composite (Filtek Ultimate; 3M ESPE) was employed as a repair. Bonded specimens were stored in water for 24 h at 37 degrees C or thermal aged, then subjected to the mu TBS test. Additionally, specimens were analyzed with a contact profilometer and were evaluated with scanning electron microscopy. Control and PA treatments were showed the lowest mu TBS (p < 0.05), and there was no significant difference between these two groups (p > 0.05). Al2O3 and CoJet treatments generally exhibited a similar influence on mu TBS values. In addition, a correlation was found between surface roughness and bond strength (r = 0.831). CoJet resulted in significantly higher repair mu TBS values when compared to the other surface treatments. In addition, the use of silane-containing universal adhesive was increased the cohesive failure rate and maintained the repair mu TBS values after thermocycling.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01694243.2019.1698202
dc.identifier.endpage1127en_US
dc.identifier.issn0169-4243
dc.identifier.issn1568-5616
dc.identifier.issue10en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85076392231en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1115en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2019.1698202
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/12704
dc.identifier.volume34en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000501424900001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Adhesion Science and Technologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectUniversal adhesivesen_US
dc.subjectbulk-fill compositesen_US
dc.subjectresin compositesen_US
dc.subjectdurabilityen_US
dc.subjectbond strengthen_US
dc.titleEfficacy of different surface treatments and universal adhesives on the microtensile bond strength of bulk-fill composite repairen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ N/A ]
İsim:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Boyut:
1.24 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu