FORAGE YIELD AND QUALITY OF QUINOA (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) GENOTYPES HARVESTED AT DIFFERENT CUTTING STAGES UNDER MEDITERRANEAN CONDITIONS

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridertekin, ibrahim/0000-0003-1393-8084
dc.authoridATIS, IBRAHIM/0000-0002-0510-9625
dc.authoridYILMAZ, Saban/0000-0003-2558-5802
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Saban
dc.contributor.authorErtekin, Ibrahim
dc.contributor.authorAtis, Ibrahim
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T20:13:41Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T20:13:41Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractGenotype choosing and cutting stage are very significant to obtained better forage yield and quality. However, researches about forage production from quinoa plant genotypes harvested at different cutting stages are not enough in Mediterranean conditions. This study was conducted to determine the forage yield and quality of five different quinoa genotypes (Red head, Cherry vanilla, French vanilla, Mint vanilla and Titicaca) at three different cutting stages (flowering, milky and dough). The experiment was laid out in split plot of randomized complete blocks with three replications in 2019 and 2020 years. To evaluate the forage yield and quality of different quinoa genotypes harvested at different cutting stages, plant height, stem diameter, dry forage yield, dry matter content, water soluble carbohydrate, neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, acid detergent lignin, condensed tannins, ether extract, crude protein, crude ash, organic matter, non-fiber carbohydrate and relative feed value properties were investigated. As a result of the research, it was determined that it is appropriate to harvest quinoa as a roughage source at the dough stage, and that Mint vanilla genotype is the most productive genotype.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipHatay Mustafa Kemal University, Department of Scientific Research Projects [19.M.004]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Department of Scientific Research Projects with the project number: 19.M.004. Also, Plant material used in this study was obtained from Dr. Suleyman TEMEL from Igdir University. We thank to Hatay Mustafa Kemal University and Dr. Suleyman TEMEL.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.17557/tjfc.986893
dc.identifier.endpage209en_US
dc.identifier.issn1301-1111
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85123626425en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage202en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.986893
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/9327
dc.identifier.volume26en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000754326000003en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSoc Field Crop Scien_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal of Field Cropsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCutting dateen_US
dc.subjectforage qualityen_US
dc.subjectgenotypeen_US
dc.subjectquinoaen_US
dc.subjectyielden_US
dc.titleFORAGE YIELD AND QUALITY OF QUINOA (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) GENOTYPES HARVESTED AT DIFFERENT CUTTING STAGES UNDER MEDITERRANEAN CONDITIONSen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Boyut:
418.96 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu