The impact of economic, social, and political globalization and democracy on life expectancy in low-income countries: are sustainable development goals contradictory?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridGuzel, Arif Eser/0000-0001-5072-9527
dc.contributor.authorGuzel, Arif Eser
dc.contributor.authorArslan, Unal
dc.contributor.authorAcaravci, Ali
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T20:29:34Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T20:29:34Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe 17 Sustainable Development Goals announced by the United Nations are important guides for the development processes of developing countries. However, achieving all of these goals is only possible if the goals are consistent with each other. It has been observed in the literature that possible contradictions between these goals are ignored. Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to investigate whether two sustainable development goals (SDGs) of the UN are contradictory or supporting each other in low-income countries. These SDGs are Good Health and Well-Being (SDG3) and Partnerships for the Goals (SDG17). For this purpose, the role of globalization and democracy in life expectancy is empirically investigated in 16 low-income countries over the period 1970-2017. While globalization has been used as an indicator of the partnership between countries, democracy has been used as an indicator of accountability and cooperation between governments and societies. According to estimations of the continuous-updated fully modified (CUP-FM) and bias-adjusted ordinary least squares (BA-OLS), globalization and its subcomponents such as economic, social, and political globalization affect life expectancy positively. Democracy also increases life expectancy in those countries. The GDP per capita is also used as a control variable. Our results show that a higher level of per capita income is positively associated with higher levels of life expectancy. In conclusion, no contradiction was found between SDG3 and SDG17 in those countries. Achieving a healthier society requires economic, social, and political integration between governments and societies.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10668-021-01225-2
dc.identifier.endpage13525en_US
dc.identifier.issn1387-585X
dc.identifier.issn1573-2975
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.pmid33488273en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85100196231en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage13508en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01225-2
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/10941
dc.identifier.volume23en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000609088900006en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironment Development and Sustainabilityen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectLife expectancyen_US
dc.subjectDemocracyen_US
dc.subjectGlobalizationen_US
dc.subjectLow-income countriesen_US
dc.subjectSustainable developmenten_US
dc.titleThe impact of economic, social, and political globalization and democracy on life expectancy in low-income countries: are sustainable development goals contradictory?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Boyut:
884.36 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu