Comparison of the result of consolidative technique otoplasty and incisionless otoplasty in the repairs of prominent ears

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridKahraman, Serif Samil/0000-0003-3115-8823
dc.authoridtemel, metin/0000-0002-1829-9894
dc.contributor.authorTemel, Metin
dc.contributor.authorKahraman, S. Samil
dc.contributor.authorBerber, Ozge
dc.contributor.authorCevik, Cengiz
dc.contributor.authorAkoglu, Ertap
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T20:55:29Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T20:55:29Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractWe aimed to compare the long-term results of complications of consolidative technique otoplasty (CTO) and incisionless otoplasty (IO). The study consists of 156 patients who were operated between 2006 and 2015. According to surgical techniques, these patients were divided into two groups as IO group and CTO group. The distance between the head and the ear was assessed by measuring the four points preoperatively and postoperatively (SUP: most superior helical point, SCA: superior conchal attachment, ICA: inferior conchal attachment, and lobule). Early and late postoperative complications, operative time were recorded. 128 ears in IO group, 163 ears in CTO group were prominent. When postoperative SUP, SCA, ICA, lobule values for right and left ears in both groups were statistically evaluated, it was found that CTO technique has led to significantly greater improvement compared to the IO technique (p < 0.001). The success rate in IO technique and CTO technique was 72 and 96 %, respectively. Early complications were similar in both groups. The late period complication determined much more frequently was seen in the IO group. Concerning operative time, it was identified as significantly lower in the IO group (p < 0.001). The early-term outcomes of both techniques were similar; however, the complication rates due to suture material and needed for revision in IO technique were higher whereas CTO technique was more permanent with lower complication risks.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00405-016-3898-4
dc.identifier.endpage3052en_US
dc.identifier.issn0937-4477
dc.identifier.issn1434-4726
dc.identifier.issue10en_US
dc.identifier.pmid26810363en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84955274455en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage3043en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-3898-4
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/11852
dc.identifier.volume273en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000382945900022en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectProminent earen_US
dc.subjectOtoplastyen_US
dc.subjectIncisionless otoplasty techniqueen_US
dc.subjectCombination of surgical techniqueen_US
dc.titleComparison of the result of consolidative technique otoplasty and incisionless otoplasty in the repairs of prominent earsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ N/A ]
İsim:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Boyut:
1.55 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu