Inter-observer variability of radiologists and gynecologists in hysterosalpingogram evaluation

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorscopusid56185523700
dc.authorscopusid25655437400
dc.authorscopusid55898863200
dc.authorscopusid56667077400
dc.authorscopusid8549730700
dc.contributor.authorGüler Okyay, Ayşe
dc.contributor.authorÖner, Gökalp
dc.contributor.authorÇölçimen, Neşe
dc.contributor.authorTuran, Arzu
dc.contributor.authorBeyazal Çeliker, Fatma
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-19T15:48:34Z
dc.date.available2024-09-19T15:48:34Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: Reading of hysterosalpingography (HSG) films is important for management of patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare HSG interpretation of radiologists and clinicians. Material and Methods: Two clinicians and 2 radiologists, who were 35-43 years old and were fulfilled 5 years in their speciality, evaluated 116 hysterosalpingograms. HSG pictures were viewed at computer monitor and the observers were asked to evaluate them within a standard framework consisted of several questions for diagnosis of uterine and tubal disease. The consistency of each individual reader, the reliability of detecting specific abnormalities, and the consistency of clinicians compared with radiologists was measured. Results: There were statistically significant differences in the consistency of interpretations for contour of uterine cavity, uterine deviation, and uterine filling defect (p<0.05). Evaluation of uterine anomalies with HSG were similar between clinicians and radiologists (p>0.05). Although ratios of hydrosalphinx were similar between clinicians and radiologists (p>0.05), there were differences for the evaluation of bilateral tubal contrast falling (p<0.05). Conclusion: Gynecologists have more inter-observer variability than radiologists in hysterosalpingography evaluation. However, both clinicians and radiologists were compatible within themselves. Compatibility of radiologists was higher than that of clinicians. Better designed studies are needed in order to confirm the variability of HSG reports and to answer the question of "who should read HSGs of infertile women?. © Copyright 2016 by Türkiye Klinikleri.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5336/gynobstet.2015-47072
dc.identifier.endpage22en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-0306
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84973859805en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage18en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5336/gynobstet.2015-47072
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/15170
dc.identifier.volume26en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOrtadogŸu Reklam Tanitim Yayincilik Turizm Egitim Insaat Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkiye Klinikleri Jinekoloji Obstetriken_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectHysterosalpingographyen_US
dc.subjectInfertilityen_US
dc.titleInter-observer variability of radiologists and gynecologists in hysterosalpingogram evaluationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu