Rootstocks affected postharvest performance of grafted ‘Crisby’ an‘Crimson Tide’ Watermelon cultivars

dc.authorscopusid14831507200
dc.authorscopusid26022755800
dc.authorscopusid6603653672
dc.authorscopusid55770224000
dc.authorscopusid57195491213
dc.authorscopusid57195494820
dc.authorscopusid54413270800
dc.contributor.authorÖzdemir, Ahmet Erhan
dc.contributor.authorÇandir, Elif
dc.contributor.authorYetişir, Halit
dc.contributor.authorAras, Veysel
dc.contributor.authorArslan, Ömer
dc.contributor.authorBaltaer, Özay
dc.contributor.authorÜstün, Durmus
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-19T15:48:31Z
dc.date.available2024-09-19T15:48:31Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractWatermelon fruit from ‘Crisby’ (CR) and ‘Crimson Tide’ (CT) grafted onto Ferro, RS841, Argentario and Macis rootstocks and non-grafted CR and CT were compared for their postharvest quality at 7 °C for 21 days. Changes in rind thickness, weight loss, fruit flesh firmness, taste, total soluble solids, juice pH, titratable acidity, chilling injury and fungal decay, flesh color values, hallow heart, ripening, citric and malic acid, glucose, fructose, sucrose, total sugar, ?-carotene and lycopene were determined during storage at a weekly interval. Watermelon fruit cv. CT grafted on Ferro, RS841 and Argentario rootstocks had thicker rind, lower ripening score, higher flesh firmness and lycopene content, more intense red color during storage, compared to non-grafted fruit. In comparison to non-grafted fruit, CR fruit grafted on Ferro, RS841 and Argentario rootstocks had thicker rind and higher flesh firmness, but higher lycopene content and C* values with lower ripening scores were observed only in the fruit grafted on Ferro and RS841 rootstocks. Macis and Argentario may lead an over-ripening, softening and less intense flesh color with lower lycopene content for CR and/or CT fruit during storage. Watermelons could successfully be kept for 21 days at 7 °C. Watermelons grafted on Ferro and RS841 rootstocks retained better postharvest quality, compared to the non-grafted fruit for both cultivars. © Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştirma Kurumu, TÜBITAK, (108 O 391)en_US
dc.identifier.endpage462en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-7580
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85058076740en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage453en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/15122
dc.identifier.volume24en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAnkara Universityen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTarim Bilimleri Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectGraftingen_US
dc.subjectQualityen_US
dc.subjectRootstocken_US
dc.subjectStorageen_US
dc.subjectWatermelonen_US
dc.titleRootstocks affected postharvest performance of grafted ‘Crisby’ an‘Crimson Tide’ Watermelon cultivarsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar