Socioeconomic implications of biosecurity practices in small-scale dairy farms

dc.authoridaltug, nuri/0000-0001-5805-0340
dc.contributor.authorCan, Mehmet Ferit
dc.contributor.authorAltug, Nuri
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T20:04:30Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T20:04:30Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Biosecurity plays a crucial role in preventing contagious diseases and in increasing farm productivity. Objective: To determine technical and economic biosecurity scores of farms, and to examine the associations between biosecurity practices (BP) and producers' socioeconomic characteristics. Methods: The study was conducted on a total of 50 small-scale dairy farms that were randomly selected in Hatay, Turkey. A checklist consisting of 19 biosecurity practices was addressed to the farms. The technical and economic scoring systems were developed by the authors according to presence and cost of the each of the biosecurity practices. Results: The mean of the technical and economic scores were found to be 9.30 and 17.04, respectively. 'Treatment of sick animals' (98%), 'vaccination against the most common contagious diseases' (90%), and 'barn lime' (86%) were found to be the most commonly used applications. 'Testing for the most common contagious diseases before buying' (10%) was used at the lowest rate. Significant differences were found among the groups regarding education level (< .05), income class (< .05), and herd size (< .01). Biosecurity scores were significantly positively correlated with herd size (< .05) and producers' education level (< .01). There were statistically significant associations between the producers' socioeconomic characteristics and some of the biosecurity practices. Conclusion: Training programs should be arranged to change the attitudes and perception of small-scale producers concerning poor biosecurity practices. In order to encourage producers to increase biosecurity scores, regulations regarding financial support and penalties could be quite useful at both the regional and national levels.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01652176.2014.951130
dc.identifier.endpage73en_US
dc.identifier.issn0165-2176
dc.identifier.issn1875-5941
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid25174643en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84907474030en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage67en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/01652176.2014.951130
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/8216
dc.identifier.volume34en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000342291700003en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofVeterinary Quarterlyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectbiosecurityen_US
dc.subjecteconomicen_US
dc.subjectfarmen_US
dc.subjectproduceren_US
dc.subjectscoreen_US
dc.titleSocioeconomic implications of biosecurity practices in small-scale dairy farmsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Tam Metin / Full text
Boyut:
419.14 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format