Comparison of the effect of the rotation palatoplasty and V-Y pushback palatoplasty techniques on palate elongation with magnetic resonance imaging

dc.authoridIsik, Daghan/0000-0003-2166-8643
dc.contributor.authorIsik, D.
dc.contributor.authorBora, A.
dc.contributor.authorYuce, S.
dc.contributor.authorDavran, R.
dc.contributor.authorKocak, O. F.
dc.contributor.authorCanbaz, Y.
dc.contributor.authorAvcu, S.
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T20:11:30Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T20:11:30Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractMost surgical techniques used in cleft palate repair require the extension of the palate to the pharynx. However, no adequate information exists regarding the extent to which this elongation obtained during operation continues in late postoperative period. In this study, we compared and measured palate elongation in patients with a cleft palate who underwent a V-Y pushback or rotation palatoplasty, by means of magnetic resonance images obtained before and 1 year after surgery. The hard palate, soft palate, and total palate lengths were measured for all of the patients, and the velopharyngeal opening area width was calculated. In patients who underwent the V-Y pushback technique (n = 13), the total palate and soft palate lengths were shortened by an average of 0.10 and 0.14 cm after surgery, respectively. However, the hard palate length was elongated by an average of 0.13 cm. In the rotation palatoplasty group (n = 13), the total palate, hard palate, and soft palate lengths were elongated by 0.57, 0.10, and 0.49 cm, respectively. The velopharyngeal opening was narrowed by 0.06 cm(2) using the V-Y pushback technique and by 0.29 cm(2) using the rotational palatoplasty. This study demonstrated that the palate does not elongate during the V-Y pushback technique, as expected. However, rotational palatoplasty elongates the soft palate.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijom.2015.01.005
dc.identifier.endpage744en_US
dc.identifier.issn0901-5027
dc.identifier.issn1399-0020
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid25739665en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84929049735en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage738en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2015.01.005
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/8897
dc.identifier.volume44en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000355774900011en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherChurchill Livingstoneen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectcleft palateen_US
dc.subjectpalatoplastyen_US
dc.subjectV-Y pushbacken_US
dc.subjectrotation palatoplastyen_US
dc.titleComparison of the effect of the rotation palatoplasty and V-Y pushback palatoplasty techniques on palate elongation with magnetic resonance imagingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ N/A ]
İsim:
8897.pdf
Boyut:
937.24 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format