Implementation of a prosthetic labelling process in implant-supported fixed prosthesis and comparison of two different methods: an in vitro study
dc.authorid | Albayrak, Haydar/0000-0002-2833-1317 | |
dc.contributor.author | Akbaba, Hasan | |
dc.contributor.author | Zortuk, Mustafa | |
dc.contributor.author | Albayrak, Haydar | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-18T20:29:27Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-09-18T20:29:27Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.department | Hatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Background: This study is to compare the two different techniques used in the labeling of implant-based fixed prostheses, using the square code and using microchip labeling techniques, taking into account the properties of an ideal prosthetic labeling technique. Sixty implants fixed prostheses were produced, 30 for each group. Square codes were created on the lingual bands of implants fixed prostheses which are the samples of the group that were labelled by using square code, and microchips were placed in the implant abutments of the samples in the group that were labelled with the microchip. Results: The thermal cycle test was used to compare the long-life cycle of the samples, and no deformation was found. A survey attended by 51 dentists was created to evaluate the techniques' effects on their aesthetic appeal and their application. The data found was statistically evaluated, and the result was statistically insignificant (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Microchips data storage capacity was found more successful; however, according to their resistance to heat and their costs, the square code, was more advantageous. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Erciyes University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit [TDK-2016-4948] | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | This study supported by Project No. TDK-2016-4948 by Erciyes University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s41935-018-0101-7 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2090-536X | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2090-5939 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85058630467 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-018-0101-7 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/10852 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 8 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000461150100071 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | N/A | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Int Assoc Law & Forensic Sciences | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Labelling of dentures | en_US |
dc.subject | Forensic dentistry | en_US |
dc.subject | Prosthetic identification | en_US |
dc.subject | Dental implant | en_US |
dc.title | Implementation of a prosthetic labelling process in implant-supported fixed prosthesis and comparison of two different methods: an in vitro study | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Dosyalar
Orijinal paket
1 - 1 / 1