S-R difference in V1-V2 is a novel criterion for differentiating the left from right ventricular outflow tract arrhythmias

dc.authoridKOCA, HASAN/0000-0002-6232-4567
dc.authoridKoca, Fadime/0000-0003-0444-674X
dc.contributor.authorKaypakli, Onur
dc.contributor.authorKoca, Hasan
dc.contributor.authorSahin, Durmus Yildiray
dc.contributor.authorKaratas, Fadime
dc.contributor.authorOzbicer, Suleyman
dc.contributor.authorKoc, Mevluet
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T20:55:37Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T20:55:37Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAimThe correct estimation of the VA origin as RVOT or LVOT results in reduced ablation duration reduced radiation exposure and decreased number of vascular access. In our study, we aimed to detect the predictive value of S-R difference in V1-V2 for differentiating the left from right ventricular outflow tract arrhythmias. MethodsWe included 123 patients with symptomatic frequent premature ventricular outflow tract contractions who underwent successful catheter ablation (70 male, 53 female; mean age 46.213.9years, 61 RVOT, 62 LVOT origins). S-R difference in V1-V2 was calculated with this formula on the 12-lead surface ECG: (V1S+V2S) - (V1R+V2R). Conventional ablation was performed in 101 (82.1%) patients, CARTO electroanatomic mapping system was used in 22 (17.9%) patients. ResultsV1-2 SRd was found to be significantly lower for LVOT origins than RVOT origins (p<.001). The cutoff value of V1-2 SRd obtained by ROC curve analysis was 1.625 mV for prediction of RVOT origin (sensitivity: 95.1%, specificity: 85.5%, positive predictive value: 86.5%, negative predictive value: 94.5%). The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.929 (p<.001). ConclusionS-R difference in V1-V2 is a novel and simple electrocardiographic criterion for accurately differentiating RVOT from LVOT sites of ventricular arrhythmia origins. The use of this simple ECG measurement could improve the accuracy of OTVA localization, could be beneficial for decreasing ablation duration and radiation exposure. Further studies with larger patient population are needed to verify the results of this study.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/anec.12516
dc.identifier.issn1082-720X
dc.identifier.issn1542-474X
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid29226502en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85047926127en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/anec.12516
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/11962
dc.identifier.volume23en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000434046300008en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Noninvasive Electrocardiologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectradiofrequency ablationen_US
dc.subjectS-R difference in V1-V2en_US
dc.subjectventricular arrhythmiasen_US
dc.titleS-R difference in V1-V2 is a novel criterion for differentiating the left from right ventricular outflow tract arrhythmiasen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Boyut:
418.03 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format