Comparison of Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of WaveOne and WaveOne Gold Small, Primary, and Large Instruments

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridcapar, ismail davut/0000-0002-8729-8983
dc.contributor.authorAchguzel, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorCapar, Ismail Davut
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T20:16:51Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T20:16:51Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: To compare the cyclic fatigue of resistance of WaveOne (WO; Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and WaveOne Gold (WOG, Dentsply Maillefer) small, primary, and large instruments in simulated root canals. Each instrument was rotated until fracture occurred. Methods: One hundred twenty nickel-titanium endodontic instruments were tested in two different curved artificial canals with different angles and radii of curvatures. WO and WOG small, primary, and large instruments were evaluated (n = 10 for each curvature). Each instrument was rotated until fracture occurred. The time to failure was recorded, and the length of the fractured tip was measured. An independent Student't test was used to compare the means between the 2 groups. One-way analysis of variance and Tukey' post hoc tests were used for multiple comparisons (P < .05). Results: At all the sizes tested and both curvatures, the cyclic fatigue resistance of the WOG instruments was higher than that of the WO instruments of corresponding sizes (P < .001). The WOG instruments were approximately twice as resistant to failure as the WO instruments were at a 60 angle of curvature, whereas the WOG instruments were 3 times more resistant at a 90 angle of curvature. The length of the fractured part of the instruments was similar among all the groups (P > .05). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, WOG instruments were more resistant to cyclic fatigue than WO instruments.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joen.2016.11.021
dc.identifier.endpage627en_US
dc.identifier.issn0099-2399
dc.identifier.issn1878-3554
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid28216272en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85012918339en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage623en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.11.021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/9781
dc.identifier.volume43en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000398249400019en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Science Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Endodonticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectendodonticsen_US
dc.subjectM-Wireen_US
dc.subjectreciprocating instrumentsen_US
dc.subjectWave One Golden_US
dc.titleComparison of Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of WaveOne and WaveOne Gold Small, Primary, and Large Instrumentsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu