A Comparison Of Surface Roughness Values of Various Restorative Materials Immersed in Pedodontic Pre- and Probiotics

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorOzan, Gunce
dc.contributor.authorEren, Meltem Mert
dc.contributor.authorGurcan, Aliye Tugce
dc.contributor.authorBilmez, Zuhal Yildirim
dc.contributor.authorYucel, Yasemin Yucel
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T20:55:46Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T20:55:46Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe present in vitro study aims to evaluate pre- and probiotic liquids' effect on surface roughness values of restorative materials after one month of immersion. 360 disc-shaped samples (5mm x 2mm) were prepared from two types of glass-ionomer cements (GIC), a resin-modified GIC, a compomer, three bulk-fill composites, and one microhybrid composite. After the surfaces were polished, samples were divided into three groups (n = 15) and immersed for 10 minutes daily for one month in either a probiotic sachet, kefir (prebiotic), or artificial saliva. After that, the surface roughness values were measured by a profilometer. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) evaluations of one sample from tested materials were also added. Statistical data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni-Dunn tests. One of the GIC materials had significantly rougher surfaces in the probiotic sachet, followed by the compomer (p < 0.05). The compomer showed the roughest surfaces after immersion in kefir, followed by the microhybrid composite (Z250). Probiotic sachets formed rougher surfaces than kefir among samples. SEM images revealed the inorganic filler structures and microcracks on the surfaces. A high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement, Equia Fil Forte, and other composite-based materials tested in the present study can be used in pediatric patients who use pre- and probiotic supplements.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.33263/BRIAC116.1438914402
dc.identifier.endpage14402en_US
dc.identifier.issn2069-5837
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85103193457en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage14389en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.33263/BRIAC116.1438914402
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/12045
dc.identifier.volume11en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000640664600049en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBiointerface Research Applied Chemistryen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBiointerface Research in Applied Chemistryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectrestorative materialsen_US
dc.subjectsurface roughnessen_US
dc.subjectprobioticsen_US
dc.subjectkefiren_US
dc.subjectscanning electron microscopyen_US
dc.titleA Comparison Of Surface Roughness Values of Various Restorative Materials Immersed in Pedodontic Pre- and Probioticsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Boyut:
1.04 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu