Comparison of Unilateral Fasciocutaneous V-Y Flap Technique with Cleft Lift Procedure in the Treatment of Recurrent Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Retrospective Clinical Study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridyildiz, ihsan/0000-0002-6804-7492
dc.contributor.authorKoca, Yavuz Savas
dc.contributor.authorYildiz, Ihsan
dc.contributor.authorOkur, Selahittin Koray
dc.contributor.authorSaricik, Bekir
dc.contributor.authorUgur, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorBulbul, Mustafa Tevfik
dc.contributor.authorUslusoy, Fuat
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T20:54:16Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T20:54:16Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: This study aimed to assess treatment outcomes of the cleft lift procedure and V-Y flap technique in the treatment of recurrent pilonidal sinus disease (PSD). Material/Methods: A total of 51 patients who underwent cleft lift procedure and 43 patients who underwent fasciocutaneous V-Y flap technique were evaluated. The demographic characteristics, previous operations, duration of symptoms, perioperative complications, duration of operation and hospital stay, duration of draining of all patients, and recurrence of PSD were recorded. Results: The mean operation time was 35.61 +/- 5.254 min in the cleft lift group (CLG) and 57.42 +/- 7.327 min in the V-Y flap group (VYFG) (p=0.001). No wound dehiscence was found in the VYFG and 5 patients (9.8%) had wound dehiscence in the CLG (p=0.035). Draining time was 1.39 +/- 0.603 days in the CLG and 2.79 +/- 0.638 days in VYFG (p=0.001). The mean hospital stay was 1.75 +/- 0.523 days in the CLG and 3.77 +/- 1.02 days in the VYFG (p=0.001). Two patients (3.9%) in the CLG had recurrence and no recurrence was reported in the VYFG (p=0.189) in the given time interval. Conclusions: Both methods in treatment of recurrent PSD can be preferred because of low complication and recurrence rates. Because no recurrence was found after the V-Y flap technique, it appears to be a preferable method despite some disadvantages.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.12659/MSM.907398
dc.identifier.endpage717en_US
dc.identifier.issn1643-3750
dc.identifier.pmid29397396en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85041928542en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage711en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.907398
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/11714
dc.identifier.volume24en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000424042600002en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInt Scientific Literature, Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMedical Science Monitoren_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectPilonidal Sinusen_US
dc.subjectRecurrenceen_US
dc.subjectSurgical Flapsen_US
dc.titleComparison of Unilateral Fasciocutaneous V-Y Flap Technique with Cleft Lift Procedure in the Treatment of Recurrent Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Retrospective Clinical Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Boyut:
2.24 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu