Efficacy of Unilateral External Oblique Intercostal Fascial Plane Block Versus Subcostal TAP Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Randomized, Prospective Study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridCelik, Erkan Cem/0000-0002-7773-9562
dc.contributor.authorSelim, Comez Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorHalide, Saglambilen
dc.contributor.authorCem, Celik Erkan
dc.contributor.authorOnur, Koyuncu
dc.contributor.authorSedat, Hakimoglu
dc.contributor.authorSenem, Urfali
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T19:54:20Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T19:54:20Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of unilateral external oblique intercostal nerve block (EOIB) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery. Material and Methods: After ethics committee approval, ASA I-II patients aged 18-70 who would undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups, external oblique intercostal nerve block (Group EOIB) and oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block (Group OSTAP). After surgery, EOIB or OSTAP block was administered with 20 mL of .25% bupivacaine then routine analgesia protocol was applied with iv paracetamol, and tramadol. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) consumption were monitored 24 hours after the operation. It was administered 25 mg pethidine as a rescue analgesic to patients with VAS >= 4. Results Thirty six patients for Group EOIB and thirty four patients for Group OSTAP were included in the study. Lower VAS scores were observed in all groups. When PCA consumption, side effects, rescue analgesia consumption, and patient satisfaction were evaluated, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups (P > .05). Conclusion: It was observed that EOIB showed similar analgesic activity to the OSTAP block. EOIB may also be a part of postoperative multimodal analgesia by reducing postoperative opioid consumption in LC.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/15533506241256529
dc.identifier.endpage388en_US
dc.identifier.issn1553-3506
dc.identifier.issn1553-3514
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid38780355en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85194355945en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage381en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/15533506241256529
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/7674
dc.identifier.volume31en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001229855200001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSage Publications Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSurgical Innovationen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectanesthesiaen_US
dc.subjecthepato-biliaryen_US
dc.subjectgeneral surgeryen_US
dc.subjectevidince based medicine/surgeryen_US
dc.titleEfficacy of Unilateral External Oblique Intercostal Fascial Plane Block Versus Subcostal TAP Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Randomized, Prospective Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
7674.pdf
Boyut:
922.76 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu