A comparison of the performance of conventional and eco-friendly extraction methods in the evaluation of total phenolics, antioxidant activity, and chemical composition of anise

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridGizir, Ahmet Murat/0000-0002-9781-446X
dc.authoridYabalak, Erdal/0000-0002-4009-4174
dc.contributor.authorNasir, Abir
dc.contributor.authorYabalak, Erdal
dc.contributor.authorGizir, A. Murat
dc.contributor.authorSangun, M. Kemal
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T19:54:37Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T19:54:37Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIn this work, the essential oil of Pimpinella anisum seeds was obtained by six different extraction methods. In the chemical composition analysis, 4, 6, 4, 1, 20, and 8 compounds were detected in the extracts obtained by Soxhlet, Ultrasonic-assisted (UAE), hydrodistillation using Clevenger apparatus (HDC), subcritical water extraction (SWE), supercritical carbon dioxide extraction (ScCO2) using three solvents (methanol (ScCO2-Met), ethanol (ScCO2-Et), and hexane (ScCO2-H)) and supercritical 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane (ScR134a) methods, respectively. Also, the performances of the applied methods were compared by analysing the total phenolic content (TPC) and antioxidant activity of the extracts. Anethole was the main component of all extracts obtained by SWE (94.5%) and Soxhlet (94.5%) methods, respectively. Also, TPC values were the highest (508.5 mg GAE/100 g kb) in ScR134a extract and the lowest (27.77 mg GAE/100 g kb) in HDC extracts. The antioxidant capacity was found to be the highest in ScCO2-H (IC50 = 1.58 mg/mL) and the lowest in Soxhlet extracts (IC50 = 0.07 mg/mL). The results showed the great effectiveness of eco-friendly extraction SWE, ScCO2-Et, and ScR134a methods.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipMersin University Research Fund [BAP-2019-3-TP3-3756]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis academic work was funded by Mersin University Research Fund (Project No: BAP-2019-3-TP3-3756).en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09603123.2022.2087863
dc.identifier.endpage1356en_US
dc.identifier.issn0960-3123
dc.identifier.issn1369-1619
dc.identifier.issue12en_US
dc.identifier.pmid35723173en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85132133760en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1341en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2022.2087863
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/7827
dc.identifier.volume33en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000812891900001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Environmental Health Researchen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAntioxidanten_US
dc.subjectessential oil compositionen_US
dc.subjectextractionen_US
dc.subjectPimpinella anisumen_US
dc.subjecttotal phenolic contenten_US
dc.subjectPimpinellaen_US
dc.titleA comparison of the performance of conventional and eco-friendly extraction methods in the evaluation of total phenolics, antioxidant activity, and chemical composition of aniseen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ N/A ]
İsim:
7827.pdf
Boyut:
2.13 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu