The comparison of perioperative outcomes between percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in elderly patients

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridErdemoglu, Onur/0000-0001-7080-8601
dc.authoridSahan, Murat/0000-0002-0065-4245
dc.authoridyarimoglu, serkan/0000-0002-3236-9422
dc.authoridKoras, omer/0000-0001-9749-5254
dc.contributor.authorYarimoglu, Serkan
dc.contributor.authorSahan, Murat
dc.contributor.authorPolat, Salih
dc.contributor.authorKoras, Omer
dc.contributor.authorErdemoglu, Onur
dc.contributor.authorDegirmenci, Tansu
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T21:05:14Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T21:05:14Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives In this study, we aimed to compare the outcomes and complication rates of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in elderly patients. Materials and Methods Between April 2011 and January 2020, patients who underwent PCNL and RIRS for renal stone in elderly patients were retrospectively evaluated. The two groups' perioperative values, stone-free rates and complication rates were compared. Post-operative complications were noted according to the Clavien scoring system. Results There were 89 and 72 patients in the PCNL and RIRS group respectively. The median age was 67 years in both the groups (P = .192). The stone size were 22.2 +/- 3.5 mm and 19.9 +/- 7.1 mm in the PCNL and RIRS group, respectively (P = .082). Stone-free rates were significantly higher in PCNL group (P = .021, P = .034). Also we found that overall complication and major complication rates were significantly higher in PCNL group (P = .016, P = .029). Conclusion Despite there was higher stone clearance in PCNL, the complication rates were higher compared with RIRS. So RIRS might be a safe alternative treatment method to PCNL in older patients.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ijcp.14221
dc.identifier.issn1368-5031
dc.identifier.issn1742-1241
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.pmid33871135en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.14221
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/13459
dc.identifier.volume75en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000643407900001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Clinical Practiceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectRenal Stonesen_US
dc.subjectFlexible Ureteroscopyen_US
dc.subjectClassificationen_US
dc.subjectComplicationsen_US
dc.subjectLithotripsyen_US
dc.subjectPredictionen_US
dc.subjectManagementen_US
dc.subjectCmen_US
dc.titleThe comparison of perioperative outcomes between percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in elderly patientsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu