Comparison of synchronisation protocols on pregnancy rate in dairy cows and heifers: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorAmbarcioglu, P.
dc.contributor.authorMavridis, D.
dc.contributor.authorYazlik, M. O.
dc.contributor.authorVural, R.
dc.contributor.authorOk, M. Akcil
dc.contributor.authorGurcan, S.
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T20:28:16Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T20:28:16Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractEstrus synchronisation protocols are used as an essential strategy in the reproductive management of dairy herds, including Ovsynch, Presynch, Selectsynch, Heatsynch, Cosynch, Double-Ovsynch, and some other com-binations of these, while the optimal protocol is still uncertain. We performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) to com-pare the efficacy of the synchronisation protocols in dairy cows and heifers. Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cabi Direct, and The Cochrane Library were searched up to May 13, 2019. The comparison of synchronisation protocols in terms of pregnancy rate was done by combining direct and indirect evidence. Ranking the synchronisation protocols were conducted by using surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). 48 randomized trials involving 9 different protocols were included. Compared with the control group, none of the synchronisation protocols were more effective in pregnancy rate at first insemination. Presynch+Ovsynch was found to be more efficient than Ovsynch (RR=1.21, 95% CI:1.04-1.40), also Presynch+Ovsynch and Presynch+Heatsynch were superior to Presynch+Select-synch (RR=2.01, 95% CI: 1.03-3.93 and RR=1.91, 95% CI: 1.21-3.01). In conclusion, presynchronisation strategies such as Presynch+Ovsynch increase the effectiveness of pregnancy rate at first insemination compared to other syn-chronisation protocols. Nevertheless, the non-superiority of the synchronisation protocols against not applying any hormonal treatments should be considered in reproductive management in dairy herds.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.12681/jhvms.29829
dc.identifier.endpage+en_US
dc.identifier.issn1792-2720
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85165335651en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage5661en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.12681/jhvms.29829
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/10817
dc.identifier.volume74en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001027217900008en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherHellenic Veterinary Medical Socen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of The Hellenic Veterinary Medical Societyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectKeywordsen_US
dc.subjectdairy cowen_US
dc.subjectdairy heiferen_US
dc.subjectestrus synchronizationen_US
dc.subjectnetwork meta -analysisen_US
dc.subjectreproductionen_US
dc.titleComparison of synchronisation protocols on pregnancy rate in dairy cows and heifers: A systematic review and network meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Boyut:
906.71 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format