Comparison of Ketoprofen Phonophoresis with Ketoprofen and Lidocaine-Prilocaine Phonophoresis in Patients with Subacromial Impingement Syndrome

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorGuler, Hayal
dc.contributor.authorTurhanoglu, Ayse Dicle
dc.contributor.authorInanoglu, Kerem
dc.contributor.authorInanoglu, Deniz
dc.contributor.authorOzer, Cahit
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T20:54:12Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T20:54:12Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of the present study was to compare ketoprofen phonophoresis with ketoprofen and lidocaine-prilocaine phonophoresis in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS). Material and Methods: Seventy patients (39 female, 31 male) with SIS were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups and a 15-session physical therapy and rehabilitation program was performed in each group. Ketoprofen and lidocaine-prilocaine phonophoresis were performed in the first group and ketoprofen phonophoresis alone in the second group. Hot pack, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and exercises were applied in all patients. Severity of shoulder pain was determined by visual analogue scale (VAS). Range of motion (ROM) was measured by goniometer. Functional capacity of patients was evaluated by UCLA (The University of California-Los Angeles) score. All of the measurements were performed before treatment and in the 1st and 3rd months after treatment. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in VAS and UCLA scores before treatment initiation (p>0.05). VAS scores of Group 1 were lower than of Group 2 (p=0.020) in the 3rd month follow-up. ROMs and flexion, abduction and internal rotation were higher in Group 2 than Group 1 (p=0.009, p=0.001, p=0.019, respectively) before treatment. Abduction measurements in Group 2 were higher than in Group 1 in the 1st month after treatment (p=0.024). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in UCLA and ROM values in the 3rd month (p>0.05). There was also no significant difference between the two groups in external rotation values before and after treatment (p>0.05). Conclusion: Our study showed that ketoprofen and lidocaine-prilocaine phonophoresis were more effective on pain and ROM than ketoprofen phonophoresis alone in the 3rd month after treatment in patients with SIS. (Turk J Rheumatol 2009; 24: 88-93)en_US
dc.identifier.endpage93en_US
dc.identifier.issn1309-0291
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage88en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/11670
dc.identifier.volume24en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000269161100006en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.publisherTurkish League Against Rheumatismen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal of Rheumatologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectPhonophoresisen_US
dc.subjectketoprofenen_US
dc.subjectlidocaine-prilocaineen_US
dc.subjectsubacromial impingement syndromeen_US
dc.titleComparison of Ketoprofen Phonophoresis with Ketoprofen and Lidocaine-Prilocaine Phonophoresis in Patients with Subacromial Impingement Syndromeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu