Comparison of the efficacy of sonic irrigation and conventional syringe irrigation in the removal of curcumin and triple antibiotic paste from root canals

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorscopusid58299242000
dc.authorscopusid57193440556
dc.authorscopusid57326037400
dc.contributor.authorAdigüzel, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Koray
dc.contributor.authorPamukçu, İsmail İlker
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-19T15:46:59Z
dc.date.available2024-09-19T15:46:59Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground. The present study aimed to compare the efficacy of sonic irrigation and conventional syringe irrigation (CSI) in terms of curcumin (CUR) and triple antibiotic paste (TAP) removal from a standardized groove artificially created in root canals. Methods. The root canals of 72 anterior maxillary teeth were prepared using the Reciproc system to size R50. The teeth were split longitudinally, and a standardized groove was created in the apical region of one root half. The standardized grooves were filled with CUR or TAP with the exclusion of six teeth that served as the negative control group, and then the root halves were reassembled. The teeth were divided into two subgroups according to the irrigation protocols used: sonic activation with EndoActivator (EA) or CSI (n = 15). After the removal of the medicament, the residual medicament was assessed under a stereomicroscope. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for statistical analyses (P = 0.05). Results. The EA sonic activation method was significantly more efficient in removing CUR medicament from the root canals. Considering the medicament types, more CUR than TAP was removed from the root canals using both CSI and the EA (sonic activation) system (P < 0.05). Conclusion. As compared with CSI, the EA was not significantly more efficient in removing TAP, but it was significantly more effective than CSI in removing CUR. © 2021 The Author(s).en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.34172/JODDD.2021.027
dc.identifier.endpage162en_US
dc.identifier.issn2008-210X
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85118625655en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage157en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34172/JODDD.2021.027
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/14886
dc.identifier.volume15en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTabriz University of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospectsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCurcuminen_US
dc.subjectEndodonticsen_US
dc.subjectSonic activationen_US
dc.subjectTriple antibiotic pasteen_US
dc.titleComparison of the efficacy of sonic irrigation and conventional syringe irrigation in the removal of curcumin and triple antibiotic paste from root canalsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu