Effect of surface treatments and universal adhesive application on the microshear bond strength of CAD/CAM materials

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridSismanoglu, Soner/0000-0002-1272-5581
dc.authoridGumustas, Burak/0000-0002-7538-1763
dc.authoridTurunc Oguzman, Rana/0000-0001-6190-2057
dc.authoridYildirim Bilmez, Zuhal/0000-0002-8869-2261
dc.contributor.authorSismanoglu, Soner
dc.contributor.authorGurcan, Aliye Tugce
dc.contributor.authorYildirim-Bilmez, Zuhal
dc.contributor.authorTurunc-Oguzman, Rana
dc.contributor.authorGumustas, Burak
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T20:15:05Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T20:15:05Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE. The aim of this study was to evaluate the microshear bond strength (mu SBS) of four computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) blocks repaired with composite resin using three different surface treatment protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Four different CAD/CAM blocks were used in this study: (1) flexible hybrid ceramic (FHC), (2) resin nanoceramic (RNC), (c) polymer infiltrated ceramic network (PICN) and (4) feldspar ceramic (FC). All groups were further divided into four subgroups according to surface treatment: control, hydrofluoric acid etching (HF), air-borne particle abrasion with aluminum oxide (AlO), and tribochemical silica coating (TSC). After surface treatments, silane was applied to half of the specimens. Then, a silane-containing universal adhesive was applied, and specimens were repaired with a composite, Next, mu SBS test was performed. Additional specimens were examined with a contact profilometer and scanning electron microscopy. The data were analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey tests. RESULTS. The findings revealed that silane application yielded higher mu SBS values (P<.05). All surface treatments were showed a significant increase in mu SBS values compared to the control (P<.05). For FHC and RNC, the most influential treatments were AlO and TSC (P<.05). CONCLUSION. Surface treatment is mandatory when the silane is not preferred, but the best bond strength values were obtained with the combination of surface treatment and silane application. HF provides improved bond strength when the ceramic content of material increases, whereas AlO and TSC gives improved bond strength when the composite content of material increases.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4047/jap.2020.12.1.22
dc.identifier.endpage32en_US
dc.identifier.issn2005-7806
dc.identifier.issn2005-7814
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid32128083en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85084737745en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage22en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.1.22
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/9438
dc.identifier.volume12en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000517195200004en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKorean Acad Prosthodonticsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Advanced Prosthodonticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectDental restoration repairen_US
dc.subjectCeramicsen_US
dc.subjectShear strengthen_US
dc.subjectDental bondingen_US
dc.titleEffect of surface treatments and universal adhesive application on the microshear bond strength of CAD/CAM materialsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Boyut:
2.42 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu