Should we use urinary catheter routinely at cesarean delivery?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorscopusid8260456000
dc.authorscopusid8408485500
dc.authorscopusid26027617800
dc.authorscopusid51564457900
dc.authorscopusid8874797600
dc.contributor.authorKolusari, Ali
dc.contributor.authorZetero?lu, Şahin
dc.contributor.authorŞahin, H. Güler
dc.contributor.authorRamazan, Sürücü
dc.contributor.authorKamaci, Mansur
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-19T15:45:28Z
dc.date.available2024-09-19T15:45:28Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare intraoperative complications and postoperative morbidity of patients to whom urinary catheter were performed or not in cesarean deliveries. STUDY DESING: This study was designed as a prospective randomised study. Fifty patients (Group 1) who delivered with cesarean section after spontaneous mixture were compared with fifty patients (Group 2) to whom Foley urinary catheter were performed before the opertaion for intraoperative complications and postoperative morbidity. FINDINGS: There were no significant differences between the groups for age, gravity, parity, cesarean indications, factors those could increase postoperative infectious risks and operative time. No intraoperative complications were noticed in both groups. Postoperative mobilization was significantly earlier in Group 1 (6.58±1.69 hours vs 12.52±4.48 hours). The average time to first void was 5.24±3.53 hours in Group 1. In Group 2, two patients (% 4) who had glob vesicate required urinary catheter drainage (Both of them had epidural anesthesia). Urinary catheter was removed at 12.08±4.42 hours in Group 2 patients. There were no urinary tract infections in group 1, four in group 2 patients which reached statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Use of urinary catheter at cesarean delivery increases postoperative urinary tract infections. We think that use of urinary catheter at cesarean delivery is ineffective.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage153en_US
dc.identifier.issn1016-5126
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-43449136504en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage150en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/14712
dc.identifier.volume21en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.relation.ispartofJinekoloji ve Obstetrik Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCesarean deliveryen_US
dc.subjectPostoperative morbidityen_US
dc.subjectUrinary catheteren_US
dc.titleShould we use urinary catheter routinely at cesarean delivery?en_US
dc.title.alternativeSezaryen operasyonlarinda i?drar sondasi rutin olarak uygulanmali mi?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu