Comparison of ethanol and hypertonic saline as a single intracystic agent in the percutaneous treatment of liver hydatid cysts

dc.authoridUgur, Mustafa/0000-0002-5922-2367
dc.contributor.authorKayali, Alperen
dc.contributor.authorUgur, Mustafa
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T20:26:53Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T20:26:53Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose In this study, the effects of hypertonic saline and ethanol as a single intracystic agents in the percutaneous treatment of liver hydatid cysts were compared.Methods The 50 patients were separated into two groups as those administered 30% hypertonic saline alone as the intracystic agent in percutaneous treatment (33 patients, 52 cysts), and those administered 96% ethanol alone (17 patients, 26 cysts). Both groups were compared in terms of percentage of cyst volume reduction, complications, and treatment success.Results The follow-up period was median 17.0 months (11.0-20.0) in the ethanol group and 17.0 (14.0-22.0) in the hyper tonic saline group (p = 0.269). Complications were observed in 5 (19.2%) cysts applied with ethanol as the intracystic agent and in 7 (13.5%) of the cysts where hypertonic saline was used (p = 0.521). Clinical success was evaluated as 100% in both groups. The percentage of cyst volume reduction according to the initial volume was determined as mean 75.6 +/- 20.43 (28.19-98.13) in the ethanol group cysts and as 68.2 +/- 16.45 (26.39-97.48) in the hypertonic saline group (p = 0.427).Conclusion The results of this study demonstrated similar efficacy of hypertonic saline and ethanol in the percutaneous treatment of CE1 and CE3A liver hydatid cysts. These results suggest that the use of hypertonic saline as a single intracystic agent in the percutaneous treatment of CE1 and CE3A liver hydatid cysts provides sufficient efficacy of treatment and cyst volume reduction. Nevertheless, there is a need for further prospective, randomized studies to support these findings.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00261-022-03795-9
dc.identifier.endpage1153en_US
dc.identifier.issn2366-004X
dc.identifier.issn2366-0058
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid36627404en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85146124548en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1148en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03795-9
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/10581
dc.identifier.volume48en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000911950200002en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofAbdominal Radiologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectHydatid cystsen_US
dc.subjectLiveren_US
dc.subjectPAIRen_US
dc.titleComparison of ethanol and hypertonic saline as a single intracystic agent in the percutaneous treatment of liver hydatid cystsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ N/A ]
İsim:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Boyut:
984.17 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format