Comparison of surgical procedures and percutaneous drainage in the treatment of liver hydatide cysts: a retrospective study in an endemic area

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridUgur, Mustafa/0000-0002-5922-2367
dc.contributor.authorAkkucuk, Seckin
dc.contributor.authorAydogan, Akin
dc.contributor.authorUgur, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorYetim, Ibrahim
dc.contributor.authorDavran, Ramazan
dc.contributor.authorOruc, Cem
dc.contributor.authorKilic, Erol
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T20:29:36Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T20:29:36Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Surgical procedures are still the golden standard option in the treatment of liver cystic echinococcosis. However, minimal invasive technics like percutaneous drainage are rising trends. We aimed to compare the efficacy of surgical and percutaneous options in the treatment of liver hydatidosis in an endemic area. Methods: Patients who underwent surgical or percutaneous procedures for hydatid disease between January 2007 and December 2012 were retrospectively evaluated. Recurrence rates, hospital stay time, and related factors were analyzed. Results: There were 44 (35.5%) male and 80 (64.5%) female patients in this study. Eighty two patients (Group I) had undergone surgery (66.1%) and 42 patients (Group II) had undergone percutaneous drainage (33.9%). The mean cyst size was 7.28 +/- 2.51 cm in Group I and 8.76 +/- 3.30 cm in Group II. Nine recurrences (7.3%) were detected during study. Five of the recurrences were in Group II (11.9%) and four (4.9%) of them were in Group I. The mean length of hospital stay of all patients was 5.42 +/- 3.16 days. Discussion: Percutaneous drainage techniques can be a good alternative to surgery in selected patients. In complicated cases like cystobiliary fistula, surgery is superior to percutaneous approaches. The hospital stay time, recurrence rate and postoperative complications were not enhanced when compared to percutaneous treatment in our study. Despite all controversy about the low morbidity after percutaneous treatment, surgical approach is still a preferable option in patients with liver hydatidosis when it is performed by experienced surgeons.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage2285en_US
dc.identifier.issn1940-5901
dc.identifier.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.pmid25232421en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84907200677en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage2280en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/10967
dc.identifier.volume7en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000341257500050en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherE-Century Publishing Corpen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicineen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectLiver hydatid cysten_US
dc.subjectsurgical treatmenten_US
dc.subjectpercutaneous aspiration irrigation and reaspirationen_US
dc.subjectrecurrenceen_US
dc.titleComparison of surgical procedures and percutaneous drainage in the treatment of liver hydatide cysts: a retrospective study in an endemic areaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu