Nanomechanical Comparison of Commonly Used Dental Crown Cements to a Newly Developed One

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridKALE, Ediz/0000-0001-8761-0298
dc.authoridTUZLALI, MESUT/0000-0002-7602-8101
dc.contributor.authorKale, E.
dc.contributor.authorArslanoglu, Z.
dc.contributor.authorAltan, H.
dc.contributor.authorBilgic, F.
dc.contributor.authorTuzlali, M.
dc.contributor.authorKoroglu, A.
dc.contributor.authorOzarslan, S.
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T21:01:42Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T21:01:42Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description3rd International Conference on Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering (ICCESEN) -- OCT 19-24, 2016 -- Antalya, TURKEYen_US
dc.description.abstractThe main goal of nanoindentation tests is to obtain elastic modulus and hardness of the specimen material from load-displacement measurements. With this study, it was aimed to establish a quantitative relationship between the nanomechanical properties of commonly used dental cements in comparison to a newly developed crown cement and to predict its performance potential. Nanomechanical properties of polycarboxylate cement (PCC), glass-ionomer cement (GIC), dual-cure self-adhesive cement (SAC) and a newly developed glass-carbomer cement (GCC) were investigated by nanoindentation tests. All samples were fabricated according to their respective manufacturer's instructions. Available damage on the surface due to manipulation was removed by grinding with 1200, 2400 and 4000 grit sandpaper, and then polishing on 6, 3, and 1 mu m diamond-lap-wheel was performed. Nano-mechanical measurements were done using nanoindenter machine with resolution less than 1 nN and displacement resolution of 0.04 nm. Berkovich diamond indenter tip was used for the nanoindentation tests. For each indentation, a set of nanoindentation tests at least on 6 different locations per specimen surface were performed to obtain more representative mean results. Indentation test load-displacement curves were analysed using Oliver-Pharr method, and one-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test, following Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk, was used to compare the results. Nanohardness (H-nano) values were 0.52 +/- 0.25, 0.45 +/- 0.18, 1.03 +/- 0.82 and 0.43 +/- 0.18 GPa for GIC, GCC, PCC, and SAC, respectively. Reduced elastic modulus (E-r) values were 9.51 +/- 6.17, 11.77 +/- 5.04, 27.37 +/- 20.61, 10.33 +/- 5.08 GPa for GIC, GCC, PCC, and SAC, respectively. There was no statistical difference between the tested materials. PCC was the hardest, and GIC was the least hard material, whereas the newly developed GCC was the second, in terms of H-nano, before SAC. PCC also had the highest Er mean, compared to the other dental crown cements, suggesting lower elastic properties. SAC was more elastic than GCC and less elastic than GIC. GCC had the second highest E-r, standing closer to SAC and GIC. Within the limitations of the current study, it can be concluded that the newly developed glass-carbomer cement is comparable to the other tested commonly used dental crown cements, regarding H-nano and E-r.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.12693/APhysPolA.132.954
dc.identifier.endpage958en_US
dc.identifier.issn0587-4246
dc.identifier.issn1898-794X
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85033365028en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage954en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.12693/APhysPolA.132.954
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/12949
dc.identifier.volume132en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000413982900039en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPolish Acad Sciences Inst Physicsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofActa Physica Polonica Aen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectLuting Agentsen_US
dc.subjectGlass-Ionomeren_US
dc.subjectRestorative Materialsen_US
dc.subjectIndentationen_US
dc.subjectHardnessen_US
dc.titleNanomechanical Comparison of Commonly Used Dental Crown Cements to a Newly Developed Oneen_US
dc.typeConference Objecten_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu