In Vivo Performance of Two Devices for Occlusal Caries Detection

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridSIRIN KARAARSLAN, EMINE/0000-0002-6298-2463
dc.authoridOZSEVIK, ABDUL SEMIH/0000-0001-9818-4853
dc.contributor.authorBozdemir, Esin
dc.contributor.authorKaraarslan, Emine Sirin
dc.contributor.authorOzsevik, A. Semih
dc.contributor.authorCebe, M. Ata
dc.contributor.authorAktan, Ali Murat
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T21:05:08Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T21:05:08Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this in vivo study was to compare the performance of light-emitting diode (LED)- and laser fluorescence (LF)-based devices with that of visual inspection (VI) in the diagnosis of occlusal caries. Methods: A total of 156 occlusal surfaces were investigated. Each occlusal surface was assessed with LED- and LF-based devices after a VI was performed. Pit and fissure opening was applied to the occlusal surfaces in which opacity or discoloration was distinctly visible after airdrying. The inter-examiner reliability of caries examination was assessed using the weighted kappa statistics. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of occlusal caries diagnosis using these methods were calculated according to the appropriate thresholds. Results: Acceptable interexaminer agreement was found for the LED- and LF-based devices and VI (kappa = 0.61, kappa = 0.76, and kappa = 0.87, respectively). Higher specificity values were achieved at a T2 threshold for the LF-based device (0.76 and 0.80) and at a T1 threshold for the LED-based readings (0.60 and 0.62) and VI (0.90 and 0.93) for both observers. With regard to VI, higher sensitivity values were found at both thresholds for the two observers in comparing the three caries detection methods (0.98 at T1 and 0.96 at T2). The accuracy values for T1 were higher than those for the T2 values, for all three caries detection methods. Conclusions: Caries lesions may be detected more accurately than clinically sound areas by both caries detection devices.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/pho.2012.3458
dc.identifier.endpage327en_US
dc.identifier.issn1549-5418
dc.identifier.issn1557-8550
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.pmid23763480en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84879827324en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage322en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2012.3458
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/13396
dc.identifier.volume31en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000321262000005en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebert, Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPhotomedicine and Laser Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectLaser Fluorescence Deviceen_US
dc.subjectClinical-Performanceen_US
dc.subjectVisual Examinationen_US
dc.subjectReproducibilityen_US
dc.subjectDiagnosisen_US
dc.subjectLesionsen_US
dc.subjectPermanenten_US
dc.subjectRadiographyen_US
dc.subjectValidityen_US
dc.subjectSurfaceen_US
dc.titleIn Vivo Performance of Two Devices for Occlusal Caries Detectionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ N/A ]
İsim:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Boyut:
142.15 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu