ANN approaches for the prediction of bridge backwater using both field and experimental data

dc.authoridSahin, Besir/0000-0003-0671-0890
dc.authoridAtabay, Serter/0000-0002-6238-3209
dc.authoridKocaman, Selahattin/0000-0001-8918-0324
dc.authoridCobaner, Murat/0000-0002-3476-7512
dc.contributor.authorPinar, Engin
dc.contributor.authorSeckin, Galip
dc.contributor.authorSahin, Besir
dc.contributor.authorAkilli, Huseyin
dc.contributor.authorCobaner, Murat
dc.contributor.authorCanpolat, Cetin
dc.contributor.authorAtabay, Serter
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T20:06:13Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T20:06:13Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents the findings of laboratory model testing of arched bridge constrictions in a rectangular open-channel flume whose bed slope was fixed at zero. Four different types of arched bridge models, namely single-opening semi-circular arch, multiple-opening semi-circular arch, single-opening elliptic arch, and multiple-opening elliptic arch, were used in the testing program. The normal crossing (phi = 0) and five different skew angles (phi = 10 degrees, 20 degrees, 30 degrees, 40 degrees, and 50 degrees) were tested for each type of arched bridge model. Recently, a major coverage of backwater field data obtained from the medieval arched bridge constrictions was published by the Hydraulic Research Wallingford in the UK (Brown, P. M., 1985. Hydraulics of bridge waterways: Interium report. Wallingford, UK: Hydraulic Research Wallingford, Report SR 60; Brown, P. M., 1987. Afflux at arch bridges: second interium report. Wallingford, UK: Hydraulic Research Wallingford, Report SR 115; Brown, P. M., 1988. Afflux at arch bridges. Wallingford, UK: Hydraulic Research Wallingford, Report SR 182). These data were also used in the analysis. The main aim of this study is to develop a suitable model for estimating backwater through arched bridge constrictions with normal and skewed crossings using both experimental and field data. Therefore, different artificial intelligence approaches, namely multi-layer perceptron (MLP), radial basis neural network (RBNN), generalized regression neural network (GRNN), and multi-linear and multi-nonlinear regression models, MLR and MNLR, respectively were used. The comparison between these developed models and one of the most commonly used traditional methods (Biery, P.F. and Delleur, J.W., 1962. Hydraulics of single span arch bridge constrictions. ASCE Journal of the Hydraulics Division, 88, 75-108) has been made. The test results showed that the MLP model gave highly accurate results than those of Biery and Delleur, MLR, MNLR, and GRNN and gave similar results with the RBNN model when applied to both field and experimental data.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [CAYDAG 106Y308]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors acknowledge the financial support of the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) under the project no CAYDAG 106Y308.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/15715124.2011.553833
dc.identifier.endpage62en_US
dc.identifier.issn1571-5124
dc.identifier.issn1814-2060
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-80053552348en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage53en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2011.553833
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/8385
dc.identifier.volume9en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000212531000005en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of River Basin Managementen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBridge backwateren_US
dc.subjectarched bridgesen_US
dc.subjectflood controlen_US
dc.subjectartificial neural networksen_US
dc.titleANN approaches for the prediction of bridge backwater using both field and experimental dataen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ N/A ]
İsim:
Tam Metin / Full text
Boyut:
374.72 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format