Tendon-grasping strength of various suture configurations for rotator cuff repair

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridTumer, Nazli/0000-0003-3754-9630
dc.authoridSUNBULOGLU, Emin/0000-0001-9930-4618
dc.contributor.authorHapa, Onur
dc.contributor.authorBarber, F. Alan
dc.contributor.authorSunbuloglu, Emin
dc.contributor.authorKocabey, Yavuz
dc.contributor.authorSarkalkan, Nazli
dc.contributor.authorBaysal, Gokhan
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T20:55:52Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T20:55:52Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the present study is to evaluate the mechanical performance and initial strength of the arthroscopic Mason-Allen, double mattress, inclined Mason-Allen, and lasso loop stitch configurations. Using 36 sheep infraspinatus tendons, tendon widths and thicknesses were measured with a digital caliper to confirm standardization of the tendons. Four different stitch configurations (Mason-Allen, inclined Mason-Allen, double mattress, and lasso loop) were biomechanically tested with cyclic loading followed by load to failure testing. The cyclic elongation, peak-to-peak displacement, ultimate tensile strength, stiffness, and mode of failure were recorded. Mean tendon widths and thicknesses were statistically the same. The lasso loop (0.7 +/- A 0.1 mm) demonstrated a mean cyclic elongation greater than the Mason-Allen (0.5 +/- A 0.3 mm) and double mattress (0.5 +/- A 0.3 mm) groups (P = 0.011; P = 0.013). No differences were found in ultimate failure load, stiffness, and peak-to-peak displacement for the Mason-Allen (mean 99 +/- A 42 N, 39 +/- A 9 N/mm, 0.6 +/- A 0,1 mm), inclined Mason-Allen (113 +/- A 52 N, 44 +/- A 14 N/mm, 0.5 +/- A 0.1 mm), double mattress stitch (119 +/- A 68 N, 45 +/- A 10 N/mm, 0.5 +/- A 0.1 mm), or lasso loop (100 +/- A 38 N, 42 +/- A 7 N/mm, 0.5 +/- A 0.1 mm) groups (n.s.). Each specimen failed at the suture-tendon interface. Three specimens (two Mason-Allen and one inclined Mason-Allen) failed during cyclic testing. Conventional Mason-Allen configuration can be applied with double-loaded suture anchor safely. Recent modifications of the configurations offer no biomechanical advantage.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00167-010-1322-y
dc.identifier.endpage1754en_US
dc.identifier.issn0942-2056
dc.identifier.issn1433-7347
dc.identifier.issue10en_US
dc.identifier.pmid21085930en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-80052870740en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1749en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1322-y
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/12082
dc.identifier.volume19en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000295037900023en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofKnee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectRotator cuff repairen_US
dc.subjectMason-Allenen_US
dc.subjectLasso loopen_US
dc.subjectDouble mattress stitchen_US
dc.titleTendon-grasping strength of various suture configurations for rotator cuff repairen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ N/A ]
İsim:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Boyut:
1.63 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu