Responses of six Turkish apricot cultivars to 'Candidatus Phytoplasma prunorum' under greenhouse conditions

dc.contributor.authorSerce, Cigdem Ulubas
dc.contributor.authorGazel, Mona
dc.contributor.authorYalcin, Songul
dc.contributor.authorCadlayan, Kadriye
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T20:19:51Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T20:19:51Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description1st Annual Meeting of the International-Phytoplasmologist-Working-Group -- NOV 12-15, 2007 -- Bologna, ITALYen_US
dc.description.abstractTurkey leads in apricot, Prunus armeniaca L., production in the world, In Turkey, apricot is mainly produced for table and dry consumption. Both local and foreign cultivars are grown for table production while local cultivars dominate drying. Although there are several reports for 'Candidatus Phytoplasma prunorum' infections focusing on coastal regions, there are no reports, to our knowledge, indicating the response of Turkish cultivars to this pathogen. In this study, we observed the responses of six Turkish cultivars (Hacihaliloglu, Kabaasi, Tokaloglu, Sekerpare, Alkayisi and Karacabey) to 'Ca. P. prunorum' under greenhouse conditions. For each cultivar, 11 one-year-old trees were potted in 15 it containers; eight of these trees were inoculated by three chip-buddings for each tree in spring of 2005 and three trees were used as control. Next spring, the presence of 'Ca. P. prunorum' was tested by PCR using phytoplasma specific universal primers P1/P7 and R16F2n/R2, and the plants were monitored for symptom development. The 'Ca. P. prunorum' infections were detected in one to four trees of each cultivar. The infected trees exhibited visual symptoms in early summer of 2006 and 2007. The first year's symptoms include longitudinally upward rolling of the leaves along the mid-vein. In the second year, some of the infected trees sprouted and flowered earlier when compared to the controls. Most of the infected trees died at the end of the second summer. These preliminary results demonstrate that although there are some differences among the cultivars for visual symptoms caused by 'Ca. P. prunorum' inoculation and PCR testing, all of the cultivars tested appear to be susceptible to 'Ca. P. prunorum'.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipInt Phytoplasmo Grp,Minist Delle Polit Agricole Alimentari Forestali,Comune Bologna,New Fruits Strawberry Res Ctr,Fermentas Life Sci,Bayer CropSci,VCR,BASF,VITRO Italia Plant,SARSTEDT,Consorzio Vini Reggiani,AGREA,Canlian Sociale Carpien_US
dc.identifier.endpage310en_US
dc.identifier.issn1721-8861
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-77952048262en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage309en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/9909
dc.identifier.volume60en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000251633600094en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAlma Mater Studiorum, Univ Bolognaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBulletin of Insectologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectESFYen_US
dc.subjectTurkish apricot cultivarsen_US
dc.subjectPCRen_US
dc.subjectphytoplasmasen_US
dc.titleResponses of six Turkish apricot cultivars to 'Candidatus Phytoplasma prunorum' under greenhouse conditionsen_US
dc.typeConference Objecten_US

Dosyalar