A comparison of misoprostol, controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert and oxytocin for cervical ripening

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridbenk silfeler, dilek/0000-0002-3533-0523
dc.authoridyenidede, ilter/0000-0003-1620-7973
dc.contributor.authorSilfeler, Dilek B.
dc.contributor.authorTandogan, Bulent
dc.contributor.authorAyvaci, Habibe
dc.contributor.authorSilfeler, Ibrahim
dc.contributor.authorYenidede, Ilter
dc.contributor.authorDayicioglu, Vedat
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T20:08:11Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T20:08:11Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractWe compared the safety and effectiveness of oxytocin, dinoprostone and misoprostol for cervical priming. A total of 218 patients were enrolled to receive between one and three treatments according to physicians' options. The end points were: (1) vaginal delivery or Bishop score a parts per thousand yen8 at the end of 12 h, (2) vaginal delivery by 12 h or difference a parts per thousand yen4 between the initial and 12th hour Bishop scores. Statistical analyses were performed with ANOVA, Krustal Wallis, Scheffe, chi A(2), Fisher, Advanced chi A(2), and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests. Tukey's HSD was used as a post hoc test. Misoprostol showed statistical significance for the rate of vaginal delivery < 12 h, a parts per thousand yen8 Bishop score at the end of 12 h, and cervical change of a parts per thousand yen4 Bishop scores within 12 h (p = 0.013). Comparison between cases Bishop score < 4 showed that misoprostol is more effective than dinoprostone and oxytocin. Considering Bishop score = 0 cases we calculated no statistical significance.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00404-011-1844-7
dc.identifier.endpage1337en_US
dc.identifier.issn0932-0067
dc.identifier.issn1432-0711
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid21290140en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84862610435en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1331en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-1844-7
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/8695
dc.identifier.volume284en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000296632500002en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Heidelbergen_US
dc.relation.ispartofArchives of Gynecology and Obstetricsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCervical ripeningen_US
dc.subjectDinoprostoneen_US
dc.subjectMisoprostolen_US
dc.subjectOxytocinen_US
dc.titleA comparison of misoprostol, controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert and oxytocin for cervical ripeningen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ N/A ]
İsim:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Boyut:
306.58 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu