Impact of disaggregated level clean electricity on CO2 emissions: Evidence from EU-5 countries by bivariate and multivariate QQ approaches

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridKartal, Mustafa Tevfik/0000-0001-8038-8241
dc.contributor.authorKartal, Mustafa Tevfik
dc.contributor.authorPata, Ugur Korkut
dc.contributor.authorTaskin, Dilvin
dc.contributor.authorMukhtarov, Shahriyar
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T20:11:31Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T20:11:31Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractConsidering the energy crisis in Europe and searching for alternatives, this study investigates the impact of clean electricity generation (EG) types on the environment. So, the study focuses on EU-5 countries (Germany-DEU, Spain-ESP, France-FRA, United Kingdom-GBR, and Italy-ITA), uses CO2 emissions as environmental indicator, and considers clean EG types as explanatory variables by controlling geopolitical risk. Accordingly, the study uses data from 2(nd) January 2019 to 29(th) February 2024 and applies bivariate and multivariate quantile-on-quantile regression (BQQ & MQQ) and Granger causality-in-quantiles (GCQ) as the fundamental approaches, while quantile regression (QR) is performed for the consistency check. The outcomes reveal that (i) hydro EG increases CO2 emissions across countries excluding DEU at lower and middle quantiles; (ii) solar EG curbs CO2 emissions at middle quantiles in DEU, higher quantiles in ESP and FRA, and middle and higher quantiles in ITA; (iii) wind EG has an almost decreasing impact across quantiles excluding higher quantiles in DEU and FRA; (iv) clean EG types are almost causally impactful on CO2 emissions across quantiles; (v) geopolitical risk decreases the power of the impact of clean EG alternatives on CO2 emissions, but does not change them in a reverse way. To sum up, the impact of clean EG types on CO2 emissions in EU-5 countries varies across EG types, quantiles, and countries. Thus, the study suggests that wind EG is highly beneficial for all EU-5 countries, while there is also room for growth to benefit from hydro and solar EG for some countries.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0958305X241266270
dc.identifier.issn0958-305X
dc.identifier.issn2048-4070
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85200219749en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X241266270
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/8920
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001283452500001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSage Publications Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofEnergy & Environmenten_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCO2 emissionsen_US
dc.subjectclean electricityen_US
dc.subjectEU-5 countriesen_US
dc.subjectdaily dataen_US
dc.subjectQQ approachesen_US
dc.titleImpact of disaggregated level clean electricity on CO2 emissions: Evidence from EU-5 countries by bivariate and multivariate QQ approachesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu