Comparison between ultrasound-guided sciatic-femoral nerve block and unilateral spinal anaesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorDavarci, Isil
dc.contributor.authorTuzcu, Kasim
dc.contributor.authorKarcioglu, Murat
dc.contributor.authorHakimoglu, Sedat
dc.contributor.authorOzden, Raif
dc.contributor.authorYengil, Erhan
dc.contributor.authorAkkurt, Cagla Ozbakis
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T20:29:27Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T20:29:27Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective To compare unilateral spinal anaesthesia (USA) and ultrasound-guided combined sciatic-femoral nerve block (USFB) in ambulatory arthroscopic knee surgeries in terms of haemodynamic stability, nerve block quality, bladder function, adverse events and time-to-readiness for discharge (TRD). Methods Patients undergoing ambulatory arthroscopic knee surgery were randomly assigned to one of two groups. The USA group received 2ml (10mg) of 0.5% levobupivacaine and the USFB group received a 25ml mixture consisting of 10ml of 2.0% lidocaine, 10ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine and 5ml of saline (15ml for the femoral and 10ml for the sciatic nerve block). Preparation time (PT), surgical anaesthesia time (SAT), operation time, total anaesthesia time, time-to-first spontaneous urination, time-to-first analgesia, TRD, adverse events and patient satisfaction were recorded. Results A total of 40 patients were enrolled in the study (n=20 per group). PT, SAT, total anaesthesia time and time-to-first analgesia were significantly shorter in the USA group than the USFB group; time-to-first spontaneous urination and TRD were significantly longer in the USA group than the USFB group. Conclusions USFB provided sufficient duration of sensory blockade and it reduced the TRD and the rate of adverse events.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0300060513498671
dc.identifier.endpage1647en_US
dc.identifier.issn0300-0605
dc.identifier.issn1473-2300
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid24029022en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84887274075en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1639en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/0300060513498671
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/10838
dc.identifier.volume41en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000325273700027en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSage Publications Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of International Medical Researchen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectKnee arthroscopyen_US
dc.subjectultrasound-guideden_US
dc.subjectsciatic-femoral nerve blocken_US
dc.subjectspinal anaesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectpainen_US
dc.subjectpostoperative outcomesen_US
dc.titleComparison between ultrasound-guided sciatic-femoral nerve block and unilateral spinal anaesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Boyut:
137.11 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu