The Effect of Different Obturation Techniques Using Different Root Canal Sealers on the Residual Filling Material After Retreatment Procedures

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorSari, M.
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, K.
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T19:52:31Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T19:52:31Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: This study aimed to compare the effect of different obturation techniques with root canal sealers on the residual filling material after retreatment using SEM. Material and Method: Sixty (60) single rooted mandibular premolars were selected and instrumented with rotary files using the Mtwo system up to file size 30/.05 taper. The samples were randomly divided to two groups based on the type of sealer and three sub-groups (n=10) based on the obturating technique used. The root fillings were removed using the PTUR system files and the specimens were longitudinally sectioned while digital images were obtained from the root canals with SEM. The time required to reach working lenght were recorded. Results: There was no difference in terms of the smear score when comparing both sealer and obturation technique groups in the apical third. Smear scores were significantly affected by the type of sealer and obturation technique in the medium and coronal thirds of root canals (p<0.05). Higher smear scores were obtained with GFB than AH Plus (p<0.05). The time required to reach working length with GFB was longer than AH Plus (p<0.05). Conclusion: Residual filling material was observed in all samples, regardless of the root canal sealer or the obturation technique used. There was a significantly lower smear scores in the AH Plus groups as compared to the GFB.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipHatay Mustafa Kemal University Scientific Research Projects [20.U.008]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was funded by the Hatay Mustafa Kemal University Scientific Research Projects within the scope of project 20.U.008.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/njcp.njcp_33_23
dc.identifier.endpage179en_US
dc.identifier.issn1119-3077
dc.identifier.issn2229-7731
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid38409144en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85186475096en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage174en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_33_23
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/7485
dc.identifier.volume27en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001177325400015en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer Medknow Publicationsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofNigerian Journal of Clinical Practiceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAH Plusen_US
dc.subjectGuttaFlow Biosealen_US
dc.subjectobturationen_US
dc.subjectretreatmenten_US
dc.subjectSEMen_US
dc.titleThe Effect of Different Obturation Techniques Using Different Root Canal Sealers on the Residual Filling Material After Retreatment Proceduresen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
7485.pdf
Boyut:
802.83 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu