Evaluation of the visibility of peri-implant bone defects using ultrasonography with two types of probes

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridAKTUNA BELGIN, Ceren/0000-0001-7780-3395
dc.authoridOrhan, Kaan/0000-0001-6768-0176
dc.contributor.authorOrhan, Kaan
dc.contributor.authorSerindere, Gozde
dc.contributor.authorBelgin, Ceren Aktuna
dc.contributor.authorKurt, Mehmet Hakan
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T20:04:39Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T20:04:39Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of intraoral and extraoral ultrasonography evaluations performed with two different types of probes (linear and hockey stick) for the visibility of peri-implant bone defects. Material and methods: Fourteen implants were inserted into sheep heads. Peri-implant bone defects were created without knowing the depth, which served as the gold standard for the defects. The defects were scanned with two different probe types (linear and hockey stick probes) extraorally and intraorally, using two different ultrasonography systems. For intra- and interobserver agreements for each probe types, Kappa coefficients were calculated. Results: The lowest ICC values were found in both intra- (ICC = 0.696) and interobserver reliability (ICC = 0.762) obtained with the extraorally used linear probe. There was a high agreement with the gold standard when using hockey sticky probes intraorally. For both linear probes, there were no significant differences in agreement among the two observers and the gold standard (p >0.05). Conclusions: High agreement was found when using high-frequency hockey stick probes intraorally, which means that they can be used with good effect for the evaluation of the visibility of peri-implant bone defects. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first one on this subject. Thus, it can be stated that US can be an alternative method of examining defects. However, further studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of US in visualizing peri-implant bone defects.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.15557/JoU.2021.0033
dc.identifier.endpageE212en_US
dc.identifier.issn2084-8404
dc.identifier.issue86en_US
dc.identifier.pmid34540274en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85114929724en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpageE206en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.15557/JoU.2021.0033
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/8297
dc.identifier.volume21en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000688534600003en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMedical Communicationsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Ultrasonographyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectbone defectsen_US
dc.subjectcone-beam computed tomographyen_US
dc.subjectimplant dentistryen_US
dc.subjectultrasonographyen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of the visibility of peri-implant bone defects using ultrasonography with two types of probesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Tam Metin / Full text
Boyut:
427.4 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu