Painful and painless shoulder Magnetic Resonance Imaging comparisons in hemodialysis patients and correlation with clinical findings

dc.authoridFIDAN, NURDAN/0000-0002-2995-6220
dc.contributor.authorTurk, Ayla Cagliyan
dc.contributor.authorFidan, Nurdan
dc.contributor.authorOzcan, Oguzhan
dc.contributor.authorOzdemir, Ferda
dc.contributor.authorTomak, Leman
dc.contributor.authorOzkurt, Sultan
dc.contributor.authorSahin, Fusun
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T19:54:17Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T19:54:17Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Shoulder pain is frequently observed in haemodialysis patients. OBJECTIVE: To compare haemodialysis patients with or without shoulder pain in terms of shoulder motion ranges, beta 2 microglobulin levels and magnetic resonance imaging findings. METHODS: Forty-three patients undergoing dialysis were enrolled, of which 23 patients had explicit shoulder pain at night, which appeared during dialysis. Range of joint motion was evaluated. beta 2 microglobulin value was recorded. MRI was used to evaluate rotator cuff tendons for thickness, homogeneity, integrity and presence of effusion. RESULTS: Ranges of motion were significantly lower in the painful shoulder group. Supraspinatus tendon thickness and the number of areas with effusion were higher in the painful group. There was a positive correlation between the beta 2 microglobulin level and supraspinatus (r:0.352 p < 0.05) and subscapular (r:0.454 p < 0.05) tendon thicknesses. While effusion areas and pain (r:0.351 p < 0.05) showed positive correlation, there was a negative correlation between pain and shoulder motion ranges. CONCLUSIONS: Shoulder pain in dialysis patients can be related with tendon thickness and effusion. While the beta 2 microglobulin level affects tendon thickness, it has no relation to pain and movement constraint.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3233/BMR-160715
dc.identifier.endpage69en_US
dc.identifier.issn1053-8127
dc.identifier.issn1878-6324
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85008395740en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage63en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-160715
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/7631
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000391751500009en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIos Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitationen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAmyloidosisen_US
dc.subjectbeta 2 microglobulinen_US
dc.subjecthaemodialysisen_US
dc.subjectMagnetic Resonance Imagingen_US
dc.subjectshoulder painen_US
dc.titlePainful and painless shoulder Magnetic Resonance Imaging comparisons in hemodialysis patients and correlation with clinical findingsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ N/A ]
İsim:
7631.pdf
Boyut:
115.69 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text