Comparing the Performance of Conventional and Stripping Headers in Wheat Harvest

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorSay, Sait M.
dc.contributor.authorInce, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorUgurluay, Selcuk
dc.contributor.authorSoysal, Alper
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T20:11:37Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T20:11:37Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to compare the performance of conventional and stripping headers, which can be an alternative for cereal harvesting, in terms of technical and management aspects. For this purpose, grain looses, effective field capacity and fuel consumption values of both two headers were determined. Field tests were conducted based on split plots in randomized blocks that header (conventional and stripping), forward speed (5, 7 and 9 km h(-1)) and moisture content of grain (11 and 16%) were chosen as independent variables. It was obtained that the forward speed and the moisture content were effective on grain looses and fuel consumption statistically (P < 0.01). In harvest with conventional header at 5 km h(-1) forward speed, total grain looses and fuel consumption were 0.79%, 10.4 l ha(-1) and 0.71%, 12.2 l ha(-1) for 11 and 16% moisture contents, respectively. Total grain looses decreased with increase in forward speed and moisture content in harvesting with stripping header. For stripping header, total grain looses ranged between 1.11-0.86% and 0.82%-0.59 for 11% and 16% moisture contents, respectively. Fuel consumption decreased with increasing forward speed, but it increased with increasing moisture content. These values varied from 6.4 to 8.0 l ha(-1) for high moisture content and varied from 7.6 to 8.8 l ha(-1) for low moisture content. Comparing the conventional header at ideal forward speed (5 km h(-1)) with the stripping header at highest forward speed (9 km h(-1)), it was found that the total losses were almost same for both two headers, the effective capacity was 153% higher and the fuel consumption was 32% less for stripping header.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1501/Tarimbil_0000001144
dc.identifier.endpage253en_US
dc.identifier.issn2148-9297
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-79955138811en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage242en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1501/Tarimbil_0000001144
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/8985
dc.identifier.volume16en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000288717100003en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.publisherAnkara Univ, Fac Agren_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Agricultural Sciences-Tarim Bilimleri Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCombine Harvesteren_US
dc.subjectWheat Harvestingen_US
dc.subjectStripping Headeren_US
dc.subjectGrain Lossen_US
dc.titleComparing the Performance of Conventional and Stripping Headers in Wheat Harvesten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Boyut:
505.64 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu