Abdominal Sacrohysteropexy in Women with Uterovajinal Prolapse: Our 3 Years Clinical Experience

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorKarateke, Atilla
dc.contributor.authorKurt, Raziye Keskin
dc.contributor.authorDede, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorOzkaya, Defne
dc.contributor.authorGul, Ayhan
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T19:47:59Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T19:47:59Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Ãœniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAim: Weakening of uterine supporting ligaments, especially cardinal and uterosacral ligaments, causes uterovaginal prolapse. Although uterovaginal prolapse is not related to uterus, hysterectomy has been the most preferred surgery in these situations. However, in recent years, uterine preservation surgery has become popular because patients begin to prefer uterus preservation for psychological reasons and site specific surgery has been developed. One of the most important uterine preservation surgery is abdominal sacrohysteropexy(ASH). In this study, we aim to present our clinical result of ASH surgey in women with uterovaginal prolapsus. Material and Method: Of 27 patients who had ASH operation due to uterovaginal prolapsus between January 2010-March 2013 in our clinic were included in the study. All the patients had preoperative urogenital examination and transvaginal ultrasonography were performed before operation. Pelvic organ prolapsus degree were recorded according to the pelvic organ prolapsus quantification system(POP-Q). ASH operation was performed by laparatomy to all patients. Of 5 patients who had stress type incontinance had 'Burch' operation concomitantly. Results: The mean hospitalization day of patients who had ASH operation was 2.6 days(range 2-5days) and the mean age of patients were 52.8 +/- 7.5. None of the patients had bladder, ureter or intestine injury due to operation. While anatomical success rate were 92.6%, recurrence rate was 7.4 % at the end of first year. Ileus was not observed and only one patient who had burch operation had recurrent urinary incontinance symptoms at the end of the first year. Discussion: Our study results showed that ASH operation is a successfull operation in pelvic organ prolapse. This method also was found to be superior to others in terms of minimal complications.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4328/JCAM.2598
dc.identifier.endpage29en_US
dc.identifier.issn1309-0720
dc.identifier.issn1309-2014
dc.identifier.startpage26en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4328/JCAM.2598
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/7269
dc.identifier.volume6en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000215585400020en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.publisherDerman Medical Publen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical and Analytical Medicineen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAbdominal Sacrohysteropexyen_US
dc.subjectBurchen_US
dc.subjectUterovaginal Prolapseen_US
dc.titleAbdominal Sacrohysteropexy in Women with Uterovajinal Prolapse: Our 3 Years Clinical Experienceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
Ä°sim:
7269.pdf
Boyut:
632.16 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Ä°ndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu