Comparison of the Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Reciproc and Reciproc Blue Nickel-Titanium Instruments in Artificial Canals with Single and Double (S-shaped) Curvatures

dc.contributor.authorAdiguzel, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorTurgay, Berk
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T20:13:42Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T20:13:42Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to compare the cyclic fatigue resistance of Reciproc (VDW, Munich, Germany) and Reciproc Blue (VDW) in artificial canals with both single and double (s-shaped) curvatures. Methods: In total, 80 instruments were tested in this study. Reciproc R40 and Reciproc Blue R40 instruments were selected for the cyclic fatigue resistance test (n=20 in each test). Each instrument was rotated in canals with a single curvature (60 degrees curvature, 5-mm radius) and a double curvature (first coronal curve: 60 degrees curvature and 5-mm radius; second apical curve: 70 degrees and 2-mm radius) until fracture. The time to fracture was calculated, and the length of each fractured fragment was recorded. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's post hoc tests were used to analyse the time to failure. Results: All the instruments had significantly higher fatigue resistance in the single simulated curvature canal than in the double curvature canal (P<0.05). In both curvature groups, the time to fracture of the Reciproc Blue was longer than that of the Reciproc instruments (P<0.05). In the double curvature canal, the instruments tended to fracture more often in the apical curvature than in the coronal curvature. There was no significant difference in the length of the broken fragments between the two groups in either the single or double canal curvatures (P>0.05). Conclusion: The Reciproc Blue instruments showed higher cyclic fatigue resistance than the Reciproc instruments in both single and double canal curvatures.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/eej.2017.17038
dc.identifier.issn2548-0839
dc.identifier.pmid33403340en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85089662630en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5152/eej.2017.17038
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/9332
dc.identifier.volume2en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000428765700001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAves Press Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Endodontic Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCyclic fatigue resistanceen_US
dc.subjectendodonticsen_US
dc.subjectreciprocen_US
dc.subjectreciproc blueen_US
dc.titleComparison of the Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Reciproc and Reciproc Blue Nickel-Titanium Instruments in Artificial Canals with Single and Double (S-shaped) Curvaturesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar