Scientific Publication Performance of Turkish Anaesthesia Clinics in High Impact Factor International Journals Between 2005 and 2014: A Bibliometric Analysis

dc.authoridYilmaz, Huseyin Oguz/0000-0001-8743-1476
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Huseyin Oguz
dc.contributor.authorBabazade, Rovnat
dc.contributor.authorTuran, Oguz Alp
dc.contributor.authorBabazade, Betul
dc.contributor.authorKoyuncu, Onur
dc.contributor.authorTuran, Alparslan
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T21:00:25Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T21:00:25Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: International scientific publication productivity is a tangible indicator for the accuracy of scientific policies. The quality of scientific publications is not increasing despite the fast increase in the publication count in Turkey. The international publication activities of Turkish anaesthesia clinics have not been previously explored. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the high quality scientific productivity of Turkish anesthesia clinics within the last 10 years. Methods: We searched for studies conducted by anaesthesiologists in Turkey within the last 10 years and published in journals listed under the medical subject categories of anaesthesiology and critical care using 'Thomson Reuters InCites' and PubMed databases. We recorded publication year, subject, method, citation count and origin of each paper and conducted descriptive analyses. Results: There were 630 papers meeting our inclusion criteria. Among those, 525 (83%) were studies on anaesthesia, 66 (10%) were studies on critical care and 39 (6%) were studies on pain. The average citation count was 9.90. There were 376 controlled/randomized controlled trials, 98 observational studies, 66 laboratory studies, 64 case series/reports, 5 reviews and 21 letters to the editor. Studies were conducted by universities (82.4%), by training and research hospitals (15.56%), by state and military hospitals (0.63%) and by physicians in private practice (1.27%). Baskent University had the highest publication count, Istanbul University had the highest citation count and Trakya University had the highest publication count per faculty teaching staff. Conclusion: The high-impact scientific productivity of Turkish anesthesia clinics is in a downward trend in the last 10 years, and the average citation count is lower than the global average.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/TJAR.2016.16680
dc.identifier.endpage25en_US
dc.identifier.issn2667-6370
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid28377836en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85014648401en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage16en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5152/TJAR.2016.16680
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/12671
dc.identifier.volume45en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000396671900006en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.publisherAvesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimationen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectTurkeyen_US
dc.subjectanaesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectnational bibliographyen_US
dc.subjectbibliometric analysisen_US
dc.subjectanaesthesia publications from Turkeyen_US
dc.titleScientific Publication Performance of Turkish Anaesthesia Clinics in High Impact Factor International Journals Between 2005 and 2014: A Bibliometric Analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Boyut:
242.56 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format