Comparison of Anaerobic Performance with Laboratory and Field Tests in Trained Children

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorscopusid58039344100
dc.authorscopusid23034651000
dc.authorscopusid36854153200
dc.contributor.authorLöklüoğlu, Berkay
dc.contributor.authorGüvenç, Alpay
dc.contributor.authorAslan, Alper
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-19T15:43:29Z
dc.date.available2024-09-19T15:43:29Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAnaerobic performance is considered an indicator of performance for short-term muscle activities of high intensity. It is important to determine whether different anaerobic field tests performed to measure anaerobic performance can be used as an alternative to WAnT performed in the laboratory. The study aimed to compare the anaerobic performance with laboratory and field tests in trained children. One-hundred four athletes between the ages of 10 and 16, minimum age of training of one year in different sports voluntarily participated in the study. Wingate Anaerobic Test (WAnT) was performed as the reference test. Besides, Running-based Anaerobic Sprint Test (RAST) and Pediatric RAST (PRAST) were performed to determine anaerobic performance. Peak power (PP), average power (AP), minimum power (MP), fatigue index (FI) and total exercise time (TED) were determined for each test. All variables of WAnT, RAST, and PRAST were significantly different (p<0.01). According to test-retest results of all tests, ICC [95% CI] values have a high-reliability coefficient for all variables. It was found there is a high correlation significantly between WAnT and RAST for all variables (p<0.01). Besides, there were also high correlations significantly between WAnT-PRAST and RAST-PRAST excluding fatigue index (p<0.01). As a result of this study, it was determined all tests have high reliability. Considering that WAnT requires complex, expensive device and tools, trained staff and is performed in the form of cycling in the laboratory, RAST and PRAST performed with body weight in field conditions can be used to determine anaerobic performance in trained children. High correlations between tests support this determination. © 2022 Löklüoğlu, licensee EURJHM.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.21134/eurjhm.2022.49.4
dc.identifier.issn2386-4095
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85145372720en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.21134/eurjhm.2022.49.4
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/14343
dc.identifier.volume49en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMiguel Hernandez Universityen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Human Movementen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectanaerobic capacityen_US
dc.subjectAnaerobic poweren_US
dc.subjectRASTen_US
dc.subjectWAnTen_US
dc.titleComparison of Anaerobic Performance with Laboratory and Field Tests in Trained Childrenen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Boyut:
1.91 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
İndir

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu