Plant yield response to artificial infestation of the false chinch bug, Nysius raphanus, confined on spring canola

dc.contributor.authorDemirel, N.
dc.contributor.authorCranshaw, W.
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T20:20:00Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T20:20:00Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractA 2-year study was conducted to evaluate the relationship of plant yield responses to artificial infestations of the false chinch bug (FCB) Nysius raphanus (Howard) on spring canola in Colorado, USA. Yield losses were greater when infestation occurred at the early flowering stage (EFS) than at the early pod stage (EPS), in both 2001 and 2002. In the first trial in 2001, with infestations of 10, 20 and 40 FCB/head, the respective average yield losses over all cultivars were 43%, 68% and 69%, respectively, compared with the non-infested control at the EFS, but 11%, 26% and 23% at the EPS. In the second trial in 2001, with infestations of 10, 20 and 40 FCB/head, the respective average yield losses over all cultivars were 26%, 58% and 55% at the early EFS, but 35%, 20% and 35% at the EPS. Yield reductions from FCB infestation were lower in 2002 than in 2001. In the first trial in 2002, with infestations of 10, 20 and 40 FCB/head, the respective average yield losses of all cultivars combined were 31%, 51% and 68% at the EFS, and 13%, 32% and 18% at the EPS. However, in the second trial in 2002, with the same numbers of FCB per head, no yield reductions were observed at either EFS or EPS. The number of FCB causing 10% yield loss in the four trials ranged from 6.1 to 39.4 FCB/head (avg. 14.8) following infestation at the EFS and 15.4-109.8 (avg. 41.8) following infestation at the EPS. Cultivar responses to FCB may also influence FCB yield reductions. However, in these studies all eight tested cultivars sustained yield loss in at least one trial at some FCB infestation level. Variation between trials was substantial but a significant level of resistance to FCB injury did not occur among the tested cultivars.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/BF02981202
dc.identifier.endpage485en_US
dc.identifier.issn0334-2123
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-33750924780en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage477en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/BF02981202
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/9998
dc.identifier.volume34en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000241603100006en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPriel Publen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPhytoparasiticaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectfalse chinch bugen_US
dc.subjectNysius raphanusen_US
dc.subjectartificial infestationen_US
dc.subjectplant yield responseen_US
dc.subjectspring canolaen_US
dc.titlePlant yield response to artificial infestation of the false chinch bug, Nysius raphanus, confined on spring canolaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ N/A ]
İsim:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Boyut:
525.62 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format