Single Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Multiple Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorKoca, Yavuz Savap
dc.contributor.authorUgur, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorYildiz, Ihsan
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T20:08:22Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T20:08:22Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Ãœniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAim: This study aims to determine the advantages and the disadvantages of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy by comparing the cases of these two techniques. Material and Method: Between September 2010 and June 2013, the datas of 80 patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy were studied retrospectively. Operations were seperated into 2 groups that were SILS and standard laparoscopic surgery. Each group consisted of 40 randomly chosen patients. The age, sex, weight, height, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score (ASA), duration of operation, postoperative duration of hospital stay, need for surgical drain, infection injury, and postoperative need for analgesic of the patients were recorded. SPSS 21 was used analyzing these datas. Results: Operation period was signaficiantly short in SLK technic (p=0,001). Duration of staying hospital was statisticaly short in SLK technic (p=0,001). There was no complication except for wound infection and intraoperative bleeding. Complications were seen more in TILC group but they had not have statistically significiant (p=0,238). Although first cholecystectomy with TILC technic last 144 minute latest operation finished in just 48 minute. Discussion: Operation period and staying hospital in the single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy' group has been founded statistically high. Operation period has been reduced thanks to experiences. There has no significant difference about complications. Demonstrating effectiveness and safety, and determinig low complication rises will provide development of technic.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4328/JCAM.2928
dc.identifier.endpage294en_US
dc.identifier.issn1309-0720
dc.identifier.issn1309-2014
dc.identifier.startpage291en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4328/JCAM.2928
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/8798
dc.identifier.volume6en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000215591800009en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.publisherDerman Medical Publen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical and Analytical Medicineen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCholecystectomyen_US
dc.subjectStandard Laparoscopic Cholecystectomyen_US
dc.subjectSingle-Incision Laparoscopic Surgeryen_US
dc.titleSingle Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Multiple Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
Ä°sim:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Boyut:
241.02 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Ä°ndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu