SmartClamp circumcision versus conventional dissection technique in terms of parental anxiety and outcomes: A prospective clinical study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridBAGCIOGLU, MURAT/0000-0003-4927-9164
dc.contributor.authorKaradag, Mert Ali
dc.contributor.authorCecen, Kursat
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Aslan
dc.contributor.authorKivrak, Yuksel
dc.contributor.authorBagcioglu, Murat
dc.contributor.authorKocaaslan, Ramazan
dc.contributor.authorAri, Mustafa
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T21:06:42Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T21:06:42Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: We prospectively analyzed parental anxiety and outcomes of the SmartClamp circumcision and the classic surgical dissection technique. Methods: A total of 250 boys underwent circumcision between 2009 and 2012 at Kars State Hospital and Kafkas University Faculty of Medicine in Turkey. The initial 125 children were circumcised by conventional dissection method and the remaining children were operated on with a SmartClamp device. Children in both groups were compared in terms of bleeding, infection, penile edema, operative time, cosmetic result, length of the inner mucosal layer, and parental anxiety. We used a State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) form to gauge how the circumcision affected parental anxiety. This form was completed by parents on postoperative day 2. Results: There were no statistically significant differences among the 2 groups in terms of age, bleeding, infection, and cosmetic displeasure (p > 0.05). The STAI scores of the parents from the SmartClamp group were statistically higher than that of the other group (p < 0.001). Penile edema was more common in the SmartClamp group (p = 0.039). However, the mean operative time was statistically shorter (p < 0.001) and the inner mucosal length was significantly longer in the SmartClamp group (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Circumcision with the SmartClamp device was faster. Cosmetic results and complication rates were similar. Unfortunately, this technique seemed to entail the disadvantages of longer mucosal length, penile edema, and higher parental anxiety. Urologists should keep these points in mind when choosing a technique.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5489/cuaj.2131
dc.identifier.endpageE13en_US
dc.identifier.issn1911-6470
dc.identifier.issn1920-1214
dc.identifier.issue1-2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid25624960en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84921416693en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpageE10en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.2131
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/13776
dc.identifier.volume9en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000350406700003en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCanadian Urological Associationen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectNewborn Circumcisionen_US
dc.subjectChildrenen_US
dc.subjectClampen_US
dc.titleSmartClamp circumcision versus conventional dissection technique in terms of parental anxiety and outcomes: A prospective clinical studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Boyut:
185.4 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu