Effects of abutment materials on the tissues surrounding dental implants immediately after loading: An in vivo study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorGül, İlkay
dc.contributor.authorZortuk, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorÖztürk, Caner
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-19T16:26:49Z
dc.date.available2024-09-19T16:26:49Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of PEEK abutments,\ran alternative to titanium abutments, with temporary acrylic restorations\rusing immediate loading protocol on the marginal bone loss and periimplant tissues.\rMethodology: This study was performed with temporary restorations\rusing 32 titanium and PEEK abutments (14 titanium and 18 PEEK) on 32\rimplants performed on 21 patients (13 females, 8 males). Before surgical\rplacement of the implants, intraoral and radiographic examinations were\rperformed. The patients were divided into two groups as titanium\rabutment group (Grup Ti) and PEEK abutment group (Grup PEEK). In both\rgroups, all implants were placed according to the manufacturer's\rrecommendations. After surgery, impressions were taken using polyvinyl\rsiloxane impression material and closed tray impression technique. The\rgingiva, which is thought to be formed on the model, was scraped and\rscrewed onto the appropriate titanium or PEEK abutment analogue\raccording to the groups and temporary restoration was prepared and\rapplied on the implant.\rResults: The results of the statistical analysis show that abutment types\rhave no significant effect on ISQ values (p>0.05), but the diameter of the\rimplant significantly affected ISQ values independently from abutment\rtype (p<0.05). Less marginal bone loss was observed in the PEEK abutment\rgroup compared to the titanium abutment group (p<005), and similar\rresults were obtained in both groups in terms of periodontal scores\r(p>0.05).\rConclusion: Within the limitations of this study, there was less bone loss\rin the PEEK abutment group (p<0.05). There was no difference between\rPEEK and titanium abutments in terms of ISQ values and clinical\revaluations (p>0.05).\ren_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.suppl1.1
dc.identifier.endpage6en_US
dc.identifier.issn2146-1767
dc.identifier.issueSupplement 1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid516595en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.suppl1.1
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/516595
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/16389
dc.identifier.volume11en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Dental Researchen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleEffects of abutment materials on the tissues surrounding dental implants immediately after loading: An in vivo studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
16389.pdf
Boyut:
280.34 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu