Comparison of Preoperative Urine Culture and Intraoperative Renal Pelvis Culture in Patients Who Underwent Flexible Ureterorenoscopy

dc.authoridSahan, Murat/0000-0002-0065-4245
dc.authoridGokalp, Fatih/0000-0003-3099-3317
dc.authoridEKER, Anil/0000-0003-1603-3336
dc.authoridKoras, omer/0000-0001-9749-5254
dc.authoridBaba, Dursun/0000-0002-4779-6777
dc.contributor.authorGokalp, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorKoras, Omer
dc.contributor.authorPolat, Salih
dc.contributor.authorSahan, Murat
dc.contributor.authorBaba, Dursun
dc.contributor.authorBozkurt, Ibrahim Halil
dc.contributor.authorEker, Anil
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T20:04:34Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T20:04:34Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentHatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: There is no correlation between the preoperative bladder urine culture (PBUC) sensitivity test and the results of the renal pelvic urine culture (RPUC) test. Materials and Methods: A total of 129 patients who underwent f-URS included the study. Preoperatively, PBUC was collected in all cases, and RPUC was taken when starting the surgery. Results: In PBUC, there was growth in 25 (19.4%) patients and in RPUC, there were only in 35 (27.1%) cases. Preoperative tomographic urine density at the renal pelvis [odds ratio (OR): 0.848, p<0.001], grade >= 2 hydronephrosis (OR: 18.970, p=0.001), and lower calyceal stone location (OR: 0.033, p=0.017) were determined as independent predictive factors for RPUC growth. The ability of tomographic urine density to foresee positive RPUC positivity was determined to be 0.858 (0.780-0.936). The tomographic urine density threshold for RPUC positivity prediction was 4.5, with 80% sensitivity and 77.7% specificity. Conclusion: PBUCs do not necessarily mean accurate colonization. Obtaining renal pelvis urine samples is important for managing postoperative infectious complications. Patients that have preoperative hydronephrosis and nominal tomographic urine density could develop RPUC even if the preoperative bladder urine samples are negative.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4274/jus.galenos.2022.2021.0129
dc.identifier.endpage179en_US
dc.identifier.issn2148-9580
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage172en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid1129729en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4274/jus.galenos.2022.2021.0129
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/1129729
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12483/8249
dc.identifier.volume9en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000932257800004en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherGalenos Publ Houseen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Urological Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectBladder urine cultureen_US
dc.subjectRenal pelvic urine cultureen_US
dc.subjectRIRSen_US
dc.titleComparison of Preoperative Urine Culture and Intraoperative Renal Pelvis Culture in Patients Who Underwent Flexible Ureterorenoscopyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Tam Metin / Full text
Boyut:
304.08 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format